Verified purchaser
Ignore the haters, it works
It works as described. I've had many browser automation tools (like 5), I never got them to work. Not because they don't but because of the darn barrier. I never could make RTILA run. Others required you to hunt and peck for CSS selectors.
This is legit. Go to site, get this. Finally one that works and it will revolutionize my projects.
Concern 1 Limits
There's a reviewer that wants something that runs every 3 minutes? And that's why he is giving a negative review? 90,000 is more than enough for most normal automations. It's 3000 credits per day about 600 steps (5 credits each). That review is unfair because they admit it works but that kind of use case requires thousands of dollars.
Concern 2 Old deal
I've had deals go sour, I get it. They have legit funding and tbh on all of the dead products I've seen, I can only count ONE that has ever even tried to make things right by offering the new product for free. This is now the second. Most of the time you get a "heavy heart" email and that's it. Make of this what you will
It works, the credits are fair. Finally a browser automation tool that's as close to plug and play
Claire_BrowserAct
Oct 25, 2025Thank you so much for this review—it honestly made our entire team's day! 🙏
"Finally one that works"
This is EXACTLY what we set out to do. We've all been there—staring at CSS selectors, trying to make sense of complex automation tools that technically work but practically... don't. Hearing that BrowserAct is the one that finally clicked for you and will "revolutionize your projects"? That's why we do this.
About the Concerns You Mentioned:
Concern 1 - The "every 3 minutes" review:
Thank you for putting this in perspective. You're absolutely right—that use case (running every 3 minutes, 24/7) translates to over 200,000 credits/month for a single workflow. That's an extreme edge case, not typical usage.
For context: 90,000 credits/month (Tier 3) handles most real-world automation beautifully. Your math is spot on—about 600 meaningful workflow steps per day, which is plenty for most business needs.
We genuinely tried to help that user find solutions (hybrid approaches, optimization strategies), and we stand by our pricing being fair for what it delivers. But you're right—some use cases are just outside the scope of a lifetime deal product.
Concern 2 - The RemoteSpace situation:
I really appreciate you bringing this up, and your perspective means a lot.
You're right that most products just send a "heavy heart" email and disappear. We didn't want to be that team. When we shut down RemoteSpace, we:
Offered refunds OR migration to everyone
Actually followed through (the vast majority of users completed migration)
Built BrowserAct to be better, stronger, and more sustainable
We're not perfect—there was one user who wanted something we couldn't reasonably provide, and that became contentious. But we genuinely tried to make things right for everyone affected.
Here's what matters: We're committed to BrowserAct long-term. We have real funding, we're actively developing, we're on AppSumo with their 60-day guarantee and accountability. This isn't a side project—it's our main focus.
"It works, the credits are fair"
Thank you for getting it. We worked really hard to find that balance between generous limits and sustainable business. Hearing from someone who's tried 5+ automation tools and finally found one that "just works"—that's the validation we need.
Moving Forward:
We'd love to see what you build with BrowserAct! If you ever want to share your automation wins or need help optimizing workflows, our Discord community would love to have you: https://discord.com/invite/UpnCKd7GaU
And seriously—thank you for defending our approach and understanding what we're trying to do. Users like you remind us why we're building this.
Claire & the BrowserAct Team