ltdlover58036Q: I never used an article spinner before but always wanted to.
I asked the same questions to multiple people but never got a straightforward answer :)
Let's say I am using one PLR article to rewrite it with some article spinner like Chugzi.
Person B does the same and gets a different output.
We both publish this article in our own blogs. Google can easily find that both of them are rewritten from the same content right? I mean they are very sophisticated in this way I guess. I may be wrong though (I wish I am :) )
I tried the 400 limits and seems its really a good product but if you can shed some light on my question then I will consider buying yours :)
Cheers.
Chugzi
May 15, 2024A: Hi and thank you for your question.
Unfortunately, it's too difficult to know exactly how Google works when it comes to duplicate content. You can read a little bit about Google and duplicate content at the following url:
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/duplicate-content
However, it always never seems to be enough information and that is why it's hard to get straight answers from people, because Google often isn't giving them. I always like to assume that Google is going to be much more advanced than what they share.
Now, there's a lot of speculation out there, and many of them seem to make for good logic. For example, it's been said that Google only looks for the first 10 words to be exactly the same and that is how they determine duplicate content. If this were true, then that would also mean that if you have a sentence 10 words or less that matches 1 million sites, none of them would be considered duplicate content. This would seem like a logical way to handle it because Google cannot be too strict when it comes to duplicate content or it would only be a matter of time that everyone would be considered to have duplicate content, especially with the growing number of websites, because sometimes you can only say things a certain number of ways, especially for shorter sentences. Some also say that there's actually no penalty per say for duplicate content, it's just that you won't rank as well based on your content if Google determines it as duplicate. Now to me, that already seems like a penalty, but I understand what they mean. I really doubt any of this is that simple though. I wouldn't place too much weight on the speculations. Instead, just focus on making sure the content you put out there is great unique content.
The ultimate goal of Chugzi is to produce plenty of random unique results that duplicate content is not a concern. With Chugzi, you can click "Rephrase" and "Get More" over and over again and you usually will find that for most sentences it will seem to go on forever. In some rare cases, it might not return a rephrase, but just click it a few more times and that will often get it to continue. Also, a lot of times Chugzi will create multiple sentences from a single sentence, this further adds to your article uniqueness.
Chugzi results are random, and not cached. Many rephrasing tools will cache results and deliver those to a number of different people. Chugzi doesn't do this. Every time you click "Rephrase" or "Get More" the new results that are returned were directly processed by the AI engine. Chugzi doesn't store results and feed them to everyone, so this increases the chances of unique random content. Chugzi doesn't just replace words and in many cases adds new sentences, which also helps a lot in regards to duplicate content.
Chugzi is just starting off, and the AI engine is constantly being updated, so it will only get better.
I hope this helps. Thanks again!