Hi,

I understand the concern, but I want to clarify how we see this.

Followr Studio is not a “feature split” from the original product. It’s a separate product line that evolved from a different use case — more focused on AI generation (avatars, video, shorts), while the original Followr was built around social media management, scheduling, and white label workflows.

What we’ve done is actually the opposite of fragmentation: we’ve allowed both products to coexist and be merged where it makes sense, so existing users can benefit from both ecosystems if they choose to.

We also didn’t remove core value from the original deal — everything originally promised remains intact, and we continue improving it. On top of that, we introduced Studio as an expansion layer for users who need more advanced AI generation capabilities.

Regarding pricing and credits, AI infrastructure costs are very real and scale heavily with usage, which is why we introduced a more structured credit system and optional add-ons for heavier users instead of forcing price increases across all legacy customers.

On the “ads” point — we’ve already removed promotional banners and we’re actively reviewing anything else that could be interpreted as advertising. Yesterday we also merged several improvements in that direction, and we’re continuing to refine the experience. We’re also reviewing possible integrations and helping users unify and migrate accounts so everything works seamlessly across setups.

We understand not everyone will agree with this approach, but our intention has always been to keep building and expanding the platform rather than taking value away from early supporters.

Appreciate the honest feedback.