How does it compare to Retune, ChatWith, or NewOaks.ai? \u000a\u000aWhat are your USPs that are better than any contenders in this highly competitive chatbot market?

How does it compare to Retune, ChatWith, or NewOaks. | GPT-trainer

GPT-trainer

Product details

Q: How does it compare to Retune, ChatWith, or NewOaks.

ai?

What are your USPs that are better than any contenders in this highly competitive chatbot market?

worapinPLUSJan 3, 2024

Helpful?

JasonGCIPLUS

Posted: Jan 5, 2024

Chatnode comparison?

Related questions

Will you come back to Appsumo?
Hi how can I export the URL sources ?
Changed tier 2 credits montly ???
A message to our AppSumo community, We wanted to reach out to you directly and share more insight into the recent updates to our platform. At GPT-trainer, we are committed to deliver state-of-the-art solutions in the ever-evolving landscape of generative AI. Our latest milestone is the introduction of an innovative no-code/low-code framework, empowering you to create multi-Agent chatbots with function-calling capabilities using your own data. However, this innovative approach comes with increased computational demands. To ensure our long-term sustainability and to facilitate ongoing improvements, we've implemented a Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) policy across the entire company. We understand that change can be challenging, but we assure you that your plan will remain comparable to what we offer to the general public. Our dedicated team is here to assist you throughout this transition. We hope you recognize that the value of GPT-trainer is rooted in our commitment to bringing new and improved technologies that enhance your experience and equip you with all tools necessary for building advanced AI solutions. Thank you for being a valued member of the GPT-trainer community. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out to us! Sincerely, GPT-trainer Team
To be honest, I almost expected that an LTD with renewing contingents would not be sustainable in the long term. Nevertheless, I too am disappointed, as it should be assumed that these things are easy to calculate in advance. Perhaps it would therefore not only be a friendly concession, but a sign of professionalism to offer the Sumos compensation. The current proposal implies that I will either have to offset the time I have invested in the product with a refund as "lost time", or remain on the plan and not even be offered a small compensation. Hence my specific question, why is the "hassle" not leveled out by the fact that tier 1 to tier 3 can use twice the number of bots? So 20, 40,70. This would at least show that you want to cushion the loss. Would this be a solution?

View product details

GPT-trainer

Share GPT-trainer

Related questions