Tim1000

Verified purchaser

Deals bought: 122Member since: Feb 2018
3 stars
3 stars
Jul 11, 2025

Greta Review - AppSumo Level 2 Purchase

Greta Review - AppSumo Level 2 Purchase

Overview

I purchased Greta at Level 2 and have been testing it for MVP development. While the tool shows promise for rapid prototyping, there are several pain points that impact the user experience and value proposition.

Pros

- Fast MVP Creation: Gets you from idea to working prototype quickly
- Professional Design: The generated apps look polished and modern
- Core Functionality: Basic features work as expected out of the box

Cons

- Credit Waste from Build Errors: Frequent build failures and preview rendering issues force you to re-run code, doubling credit costs. A simple 10-credit edit often becomes 20+ credits due to technical issues.
- Limited Direct Editing: Despite the company offering PLGOS (a visual editor for pre-built components), there's no straightforward way to edit colors, text, or code directly within your app without going through AI commands.
- Vague AI Targeting: When making edit requests, it's difficult to reference specific sections since there's no clear way to identify what elements are called. This leads to frustrating back-and-forth exchanges.
- No File Upload Support: Cannot directly upload logos or other assets to your app.
- AI Over-Engineering: When requesting simple changes, the AI often takes excessive liberties, recoding entire pages and removing working color formatting or functionality, creating broken features that require additional credits to fix.

Suggestions for Improvement

- Visual Editor Integration: Add direct editing capabilities for text and colors without requiring AI commands
- Fair Credit Usage: Stop charging credits for build errors and preview failures - users shouldn't pay for technical issues
- Enhanced Selector Tool: Expand the existing selector to show clear text indicators when hovering over elements, or add a "pause and highlight" feature for precise targeting
- Tiered Credit System: Implement variable credit costs based on edit complexity - simple text updates shouldn't cost the same as major functionality changes

Final Thoughts

- Greta has significant potential for rapid MVP development, but the high credit costs and technical issues create frustration. The platform would benefit from more precise editing controls and fairer credit usage policies.

Rating: 3/5 stars

Worth trying if you need quick prototypes, but expect to spend more credits than anticipated due to system limitations and overly broad AI responses.

Founder Team
Shubham_Questera

Shubham_Questera

Jul 11, 2025

Thank you so much for taking the time to share such thoughtful feedback—it really helps us improve! We truly appreciate both the positives and the areas you highlighted where things could be better.

You’re absolutely right: we came to AppSumo specifically to build that early believer community. The goal isn’t about revenue—it’s about working closely with people like you to shape Greta into something truly valuable for the long term.

Pretty much everything you mentioned—visual editor, fairer credit handling, better element selection tools—it’s all already on our roadmap. We’re actively working on it, and you’ll see steady improvements week by week.

That said, Greta is still early-stage. It hasn’t had years of polishing yet, but with the support and patience of early adopters like yourself, we’re committed to making it better and better.

Thanks again for being part of this with us! 🙏

Helpful?
Share
Ratings