I seriously couldn't believe what I read.
I still have over 130 credits left and then I get this message:

"You've reached the weekly limit of 10 motion generations. Please try again next week."

WHAT? Didn't I pay to be able to decide WHEN to use my credits? I need to create videos now and not next week.

I thought I paid for that?

In that case, I don't see any difference from a free account.

The generation-speed improvement only being tied to upgrading your account increases this impression.

Furthermore, generating videos with non-human faces presents difficulties, and I tried several approaches to get better results.

As a side-note: I compared it with HeyGen, and HeyGen had no problem with the same avatar.

I hope that this is not intended and that the avatars will be improved.

## Update 25.01.26

You chose these constraints, yet you sold a credit amount without clearly mentioning these hidden weekly limitations upfront. Why offer a high volume of credits if you know your infrastructure is not "sustainable" enough to let users actually utilize them?

Forcing paying customers to "come back next week" is not a workable solution for professional workflows. I need to produce content when the project demands it, not when your weekly timer resets.

I frankly don't believe the "fair and stable generation" excuse. If blocking the cluster was the real issue, the standard industry solution would be a queue system (time-delayed generation), not a hard lockout.

This appears to be a design choice to cut costs, hoping that Sumolings won't actually use the credits they paid for. While that might be "sustainable" for you, it leaves me with a product I cannot reliably use.

I would happily update my review, but right now I feel tricked into buying a product that operates more like a restrictive freemium model than a paid LTD.