In a world of endless document sharing, meetquo's concept is fantastic: have a fixed start and end of a document's editing life. The built-in e-signature system with careful auditing is also awesome.

Capping video replies to a minute is awesome to reduce the noise. Nested comments is great.

Few thoughts based on my limited testing:

1. There's one premise in the core design that I do not necessarily agree with: all meeting participants exist in a team indefinitely. In an internal setting, I can see this typically being the case. In a setting with vendors and clients, this is often not the case, so the mechanics of creating a temporary meeting environment may require a temporary team with temporary members.

Compare this to a shared Google Doc or Word Online Doc, which can be easily created by you in a private folder that is only yours, but then shared via a single anonymous link for viewing and editing. The shared document is more flexible because you aren't required to invite people to a permanent team and the experience for them is more temporary. For them, it's this one document via this one link, and typically do not even know the name of the folder the document exists in.

In my world, even if a meeting exists in a series of meetings for me (or my team), I would prefer external third-parties simply have a more anonymous temporary link instead of a full account creation.

To clarify an example, if you were holding a sales meeting with Prospect A, you'd basically need to create a Team called "Prospect A", because a team of "Sales - Prospects" may be off-putting to a prospect. You could also just create a team called "External" for all meetings with outside participants, but you may quickly end up with an absurd number of members to that team. Additionally, you may want to delete this team after a deal seems unlikely, but then the prospect would potentially see they aren't a member of this team any longer. In an environment of isolated meetings (or typical modern shared documents), the prospect would see none of this. They would only see their one link to their one meeting, and everything else would be hidden.

2. There appears to be an interesting permission limitation for administrators. Let's say you create Team A, Meeting 1, and invite John and Mary. All of that works as expected. Now, John and Mary have accounts and are indefinitely members of Team A. They can create meetings with each other, within Team A, and unless they invite you, you may have no idea the meeting exists, much less the content of the meeting. It is possible I missed something here or this is a feature in development. It is also possible this is an expected behavior.

Thank you for bringing meetquo to AS! Best of luck with your promo! I think this SaaS has a bright future!

Will