Any Sumo-ling that's been in the taco game for a while knows the feeling of stumbling upon something great early on and knowing that people are going to be kicking themselves for missing the opportunity down the road. Every time I purchase a shiny new tool, I'm hoping for that experience. Most fall short. NeuronWriter does NOT.

I'm excited about the potential with this SAAS. I'm pretty familiar with most of the SEO optimization software out there. I'm always looking for an LTD that could replace my Surfer or Frase subscription. While this doesn't replace Surfer for me, mainly due to the integration with Jasper, this is actually making me consider whether I need to continue with Frase.

I should specify that I haven't used NeuronWriter's AI writing functionality yet. I am basing my opinion strictly on the SEO content optimization use case. That's mainly what I use Frase for, so it's more of a direct comparison in that regard.

Some of the things I really love about it:

• Multiple keywords! I particularly love the ability to optimize content for one main keyword simultaneously with additional secondary keywords. This is something I find very useful, but lacking in many of the other options in this space competing for Surfer and Frase's spots. That has been one of the main differentiators between Surfer and Frase in the past. This may have closed the gap on that point.

• Metadata! I love that it has a separate tab for meta-data optimization. This is such an important part to content optimization, and often overlooked in these tools. Not only does it easily allow you to enter the metadata descriptions in your document, but it also gives you actual optimization metrics for word selection and usage, just like the main content.

• Plurals! NeuronWriter understands the similarity in SEO value of singular and plural versions of the same word, and takes that into account in its scoring. For example, other tools may suggest "bike" needs to be used 5 times and "bikes" 3 times. NW might just have "bike" listed at 8 times, but it doesn't matter if you use 'bike' or 'bikes'. Each one will count against the recommended 8 instances of the word. This is incredibly helpful for allowing much more natural writing, without sacrificing word choice for optimization score.

A couple of things that I would like to see changed:

• Keyword modification of existing reports. I would like the ability to modify the keyword(s) that the report is based on without having to create a new report. It would be great to be able to make the adjustment (or add/remove secondary keywords) and have the recommendation data in the content optimizer update automatically.

• DA/PA info. I would like to see domain and possibly page authority data in the list of competitors to choose from.

Overall, I'm very happy with this one! Tacos x 5!