Verified purchaser
Record Limits Are To Low and Expensive To Scale
Tier 5 buyer here. The product has potential, but the current record limits are the main blocker for me. At this tier, 500k+ records, or a reasonably priced records add-on, would make it much easier to justify and scale. As it stands, scaling could become expensive quickly, and I’m not yet sure I’ll keep it beyond the 60-day refund period. I understand this is a new offer and not the previous unlimited deal, but new buyers should note that many existing 5-star reviews appear to relate to that older offer rather than the current limits. With the refund window approaching, I hope the team can clarify whether higher limits or add-ons are planned.
Riya_NoCodeBackend
Edited Sep 19, 2026Thanks for sharing your concerns. I completely understand that higher limits would be useful for larger applications.
That said, I also want to set realistic expectations for an LTD. The 250K-record allowance is clearly stated on the deal page and applies **per database**, not across the entire account. Each database has its own capacity, and the number of databases is also determined by the selected tier.
We absolutely welcome feedback on better scaling options, but an LTD cannot realistically mean unlimited infrastructure forever for a one-time payment. As data volume grows, so do our storage, backup, infrastructure, maintenance, and operational costs.
Our responsibility is to keep improving the product and provide sustainable ways for customers to grow with it — while also making sure the business itself remains sustainable. We want to be here supporting these applications for many years, not just for the duration of an LTD campaign.