So many of you are probably thinking, what difference does this tool make compared to the rest.
I know you've at least heard of the word "Concepts" when people talk about Outranking. Let me explain my definition of "Concepts."

CONCEPTS
"Concepts" uses NLP and GPT-3 in a combined effort to come up with unique and potentially rank-able headers that it thinks will rank on Google. It takes data from the top 20 ranking sites to actually come up with these headers, which it thinks is the core reason why those top 20 articles are ranking. It's not just giving you a bite-sized list of all the headers from every single article in the top 20 SERPs. It's literally coming up with questions it thinks Google wants you to answer.

However, you're not restricted JUST to the top 20. You can add URLs into the mix and have "Concepts" analysis and come up with Concepts according to those sites too. If you want to go super granular into Concepts, you can EVEN highlight, copy short text excerpts (1800 characters I believe) from articles you find relevant to your topic and inject that into a Concept so that it can write for you BASED on a combination of the top 20 SERP, the custom URL's you added, and the text you pasted in.

BTW, you DO get to look at a list of all the headers and passages from all 20 ranking sites so you can include those specific headings from your competitors into your articles as well (It's just a tab away). And in case you're also wondering... YES, there's Quora, Reddit, People also ask questions ready for your viewing pleasures at your fingertips (in the other tabs) as well.

THE RESULTS
I don't know what it is that Outranking does, but I have a semi-technical niche full of how-tos and instructional articles and what I've found is that Concept writes FACTUAL content at least 80% of the time. (Compare this to all other AI writers, I'd say the competition writes 80% of the time lies, which you HAVE to fact check).
This is IMPRESSIVE.

WHY DOES OUTRANKING BURN SO MANY CREDITS?
Well, that's because of Concepts. I don't know the technicalities behind how credits (GPT3 characters in fact) are consumed... but it seems to consume several times more than a simple "write for me" button like all the rest of the AI competitors.
But think about this, with Concepts, you burn more credits, but you save time because the output is often right. While with the competition, you use fewer credits, but you always end up deleting and fact-checking, then delete again, and then re-"write for me" until it gets it right. Soooooooo let me give you an example...
You have five $1 bills. You can either give an expert ALL $5 to get a job done right (and well) the first time <OR> you can give $1 to an amateur to do the job 5 times until that amateur gets it right? The choice is yours...

BTW
I highly recommend using Outranking with another unlimited AI writing tool. Outranking spits out only facts. I find that other tools are great for fluff work... like intro, conclusion etc.