Q: How it’s better than Midjourney with Omni reference control
MJ can generate our photos without any model training, which is faster and much more beautiful than Flux.

Creative_Bot_PhotoGPTAI
Jun 24, 2025A: That’s a fair point. Midjourney does offer quick, reference-based generation and shines when it comes to artistic or cinematic styles.
That said, Flux is more optimized for photorealism, particularly in capturing natural human features and facial fidelity. While it does require a one-time model training step, this actually improves long-term accuracy and consistency. Based on our experience, the strike rate of getting desired results is noticeably higher with Flux, often requiring fewer generations compared to Midjourney, which can take multiple retries to dial in the right likeness, especially for realistic portraits.
So it really comes down to use case: if you're after cinematic or artistic stylization, MJ is strong; if you're aiming for believable, real-person photos - Flux generally wins on accuracy and output efficiency. Hope this helps.