Solid results for simple scenes, but credit math + glitches matter
I think the tool is decent, but the way the credits and training limits are presented feels confusing. It says you get 6,000 credits per month and can train 4 people per month, but what I didn’t realize (or didn’t see clearly explained) is that those 4 trainings come out of the same 6,000 credits. Since it costs 1,500 credits to train a model, that’s essentially 4 trainings = your full monthly credits.
I have Tier 2. I trained two models and created a variety of images. The quality is great when the images are outdoors or don’t require highly technical prompting. But once you get into more complex scenes, “so-so” feels fair.
I’ve run into issues like:
- glitched faces
- computer monitors in odd places
- random people in the background
- awkward body positions
Overall, it’s useful if you want good results for simpler concepts and don’t mind some cleanup. But if your goal is consistently polished, detailed, technically accurate scenes, you may feel limited by both the credit structure and the occasional weird outputs.
Creative_Bot_PhotoGPTAI
Dec 11, 2025Thanks so much for taking the time to share such a detailed review, we truly appreciate it. The experience you're describing is a bit unexpected, especially the glitches and background artifacts, and we’d really like to take a closer look. Our goal is to deliver consistently polished, studio-grade results - that’s the standard we set when we position PhotoGPT AI as your personal AI photographer.
If you’re open to it, we’d love to help you get output that reflects that level of quality. Please feel free to drop us an email at support@photogptai.com or hop into our Discord community (https://discord.gg/rENRJw439H), where we can review examples with you directly and troubleshoot what may be happening.
We’re confident we can help you achieve the kind of clean, consistent results you’re aiming for, and we appreciate you bringing this to our attention!