QuickAds Reviews

What I Like:
- 800 Credits for Video: Generous allocation of 800 credits allows users to undertake multiple projects without running out of resources quickly.
- Photoshoot Feature: The integration of photoshoots adds significant value to the ad creation process.
-Ad Analysis: Provides valuable insights to optimize campaigns for better performance.
- Brand Information and Image Fetching Tools: Makes the ad creation process smoother by allowing seamless searches for brand information and images.
- Voice Options: A variety of voice choices enables personalization in ads.
- Ad Library: Useful, although professionals often prefer personal templates to showcase their expertise.
- **Excellent Customer Support**: The responsive support team communicates effectively with clients, enhancing the overall user experience.

What I Don’t Like:
- Limited Credits for Image and Product Ads: Restrictions on credits can hinder creative freedom.
- Credit Usage Impact: The credit system limits the number of static ad designs and AI-generated videos, leading to less frequent use of some tools.
- **Basic Template Designs**: The social post designer provides limited, simplistic templates that may not meet the needs of users seeking sophisticated designs.
- **Weak Static Ads Editing**: Lacks flexibility and features to improve overall design quality.
- **Insufficient High-Quality Editable Flyer Templates**: Absence of advanced flyer templates that showcase company expertise.
- **Generic AI Templates**: Often provides basic templates that do not cater to branding needs, forcing users to either memorize design elements or envision their designs without adequate customization options. The lack of essential graphic tools can complicate the design process.
- Credit Usage Concerns: Frequent regeneration of designs can quickly deplete credits, raising cost-effectiveness issues.

Conclusion:
Quickads AI has strong features for video creation, such as talking avatars and voice ads, but I expect to primarily use it for video content. For advanced ad templates and video editing, other tools like CapCut and KineMaster may be more effective. Some flyer design apps also offer greater quality and are ahead in the advertising game. Quickads excels in providing accessible options for creating engaging video ads and has excellent customer support, but it still has a long way to go to compete with established platforms. Limitations in credit usage can affect the frequency and flexibility of ad creation and experimentation.

What I liked (in theory):
The idea behind QuickAds—using AI to generate ad images, videos, and voiceovers automatically—is compelling.

It promises quick, plug-and-play content creation powered by AI.

Where it fell short (in practice):

Results were inconsistent: voice/avatar outputs sometimes defaulted to female voices/avatars without user choice.

There's no branding control—you can add a logo, but can't customise fonts, colours, or styling to match brand guidelines.

AI-generated content is static: the images/videos are final outputs with no further editable layers or adjustments.

Overall impression:

The tool delivers on its promise—but only at a basic level.

In its current form, it doesn't offer enough flexibility or consistency for real-world use, especially in professional settings.

Final Rating: 2.5 out of 5 (Since I can't officially rate 2.5 I had to round down as its not 3 stars yet).

TRhis app is simply underwhelming in performance. lot better apps for ads.

The tool overall needs a LOT of polishing and improvements. The text to video generation results in video scenes that are not very great matches for the text content. Editing videos is not very user-friendly at the moment. The support has been decent, and they are clearly trying to make this a better tool. However, at the moment, there is still a lot that is left to be desired. Image ads are also very hit and miss. The tool has a lot of potential, but it needs a lot of refinement and quality improvements at the moment.

I've been using quick ads for a few days now. It is great to analyse and find competitor ads that works, to generate new video briefs, and find out what could be working.

However, I found myself using the AI tool way more than I thought, and within the test trial period, you have 110 credits but when you purchase the tiers, no matter which one you get, you only got 10. That's why I ended up taking Tier one, as the additional credits and tools won't be needed as much. The image templates are not that great in terms of quality. Regarding the videos, it is a bit slow and I'm not satisfied with the results yet...

Still a great project and website to help with creatives at scale, I hope there will be more features coming up.