The platform feels DOA (Dead on Arrival): It has significant issues right from the start.
Reluctance to leave a negative review: Normally, I avoid writing poor reviews, but the platform’s performance makes it unavoidable.

Not ready to compete: Compared to other platforms like Streamyard, Riverside, and Uscreen, this platform is not yet competitive.

Conducted six tests, all of which failed to go LIVE. (We recorded all of our test, & we have a 2GIG internet connection speed)

Chose a simple platform to test with (Facebook page), but it never connected.

The platform’s backend showed the stream as "LIVE," even though it was not.

There were no error messages or indicators suggesting otherwise.

Sharing the invite link resulted in a black screen with a rotating Streann logo.
The link also included backend studio options, which is inappropriate for viewers only wishing to watch the stream they were invited to.

Recipients of the invite link were prompted to create a half-formed account to sign up for Streann. This is an undesirable feature from a business standpoint.

If someone signs up via the invite link just to watch the Live Stream is there compensation for the referral if they do decide to create an account? But honestly, I don't want anyone that's sent an invite link to even have to consider it, they should just be able to click the link and watch.

Branding is present in invite links, loading pages, and other areas, which is frustrating for professional use.

As the owner of a media company, I have extensive experience with streaming platforms.
I genuinely wanted this platform to work and was willing to purchase the Creator LTD offer.

If the app functioned as marketed, it could easily justify charging 10 times the current price for Tier 3.

However, the platform fails to deliver on even basic promises.

Ensure the app delivers on minimum functionality as promised.
Provide users with the value they paid for.

Updated in response:
First, let me clarify that I’m not claiming to be anything special—we do what we do, and we do it well. My clients are more than satisfied with the services we provide, so there’s no need for concern on their behalf.

However, I’d like to suggest you consider hiring a reputation management professional or appointing someone else to handle your public responses. Your emotionally charged tone in addressing honest feedback about your product—both to me and others—is not serving your brand well.

To be clear, I’m not debating or questioning the accolades your product may have received. My issue is straightforward: your platform does not deliver or perform as marketed. I’ve had multiple email exchanges with your team explaining these concerns, and the responses I received were dismissive at best. Instead of addressing the core issues, I was again being sold on other parts of your platform in which I was considering an additional 2K and was asked why I didn't buy —seriously?

Your condescending tone here and in our prior emails has cemented my decision not to proceed further. For context, I’ve purchased over 230 software deals, many at top-tier levels, so I’m no novice. While I’m familiar with RTMP, it’s notable that I’ve never had to rely on it with platforms like Streamyard or Riverside—something you and your team seem to overlook entirely.

The point of my feedback has been consistently missed, and that’s disappointing. Good luck to you and your team. Happy Holidays!