This tool really has a lot of potential, and have the funding to realize the potential. Here are the reasons I gave 3 tacos instead of 5.

1. React Output: The code produces is not so much react but HTML and JS. There are no components, only <div>s and its really not readable or reusable
2. Usability: It's not so much for non-techs. The platform seems like its for developers to develop without a designer. Its low-code. I cant compare them to good builders like softr.io.
3. Templates: They dont have too many templates

What I think would make this tool be the best ever:
1. Better Figma Import: Figma import works fine. But if I import a website design, its not responsive. I need to design the mobile part again. If with simple rules they convert the design also into mobile, and let us correct small details, it would be amazing.
2. Import Live Site: I think this is a must. If they allow importing a live site, changing it and re-publishing it, it would be amazing. You can take any client site, change it, and publish with a different code output. Then I wouldnt care how bad the code output is as I can just re-import and change the site again.
3. More components: It is missing easy and common components such as navbar dropdowns for more complete nav bar structures.
4. No-code: All new features that are coming out are for enabling more coding. I think they should make all the new features that can be used by non-techies as well.

Overall, I think this product will succeed. Hopefully they will consider all these points above.