Just to be fair and considerate to everyone, I will not dismiss the negative reviews that this product has received, but I will try to reframe them. There are indeed two subjective experiences here that are probably supported by objective evidence. I assume that Texta.ai changed the terms of the offer, which caused many people to become angry and vengeful, feeling deceived. I think that Texta.ai didn’t fully think it through from the beginning. For example, they initially offered unlimited word generation and unlimited users, but such an offer could not be sustained, so they probably had to change it. They changed their mind without involving the people who had already purchased the software under different terms. This, along with the change of AI engine for those who had unlimited word generation, resulted in many negative reviews.

However, as someone who has now purchased the software under the new terms, I must say that it’s one of the best AI content creators out there. I enjoy it so much that I will probably use it as my main content creator most of the time. It has many useful and generous features that allow for more text processing than any other service I have come across so far. The blog, article, and essay features are outstanding in terms of quality, generating them quickly and including all the components one can think of in a blog or an article (including checking visibility, readability, and more). I hope Texta.ai will find (or has already found) a way to make all of its past customers feel content and happy, so that this negative review turmoil can be resolved. The product is indeed, based on my experience with three codes, a real game changer, with many merits and features that are organized in a simple and accessible way. It also has a ChatGPT assistant that works quickly and elegantly, which is a very effective feature to have at such a price. The only thing I don’t understand is the code stack issue. They say one can stack up to five codes, but their site only allows for three (up to 100000 words). That’s the only issue I have found, and I have reached out to their support for clarification.