VidChapter Reviews

VidChapter's AI-powered chaptering tool streamlines video organization, saves time, and boosts SEO. A must-have for content creators!

The tool works perfectly for Chapters, also the Title, Description, and Tags work perfectly.

Few suggestions
1. Option to generate all together option (Right now I need more time to generate because I need to do it one by one, So, reduce 4 credits together and generate output with Title, Description, Tag & Chapter altogether. (Keep in mind, Separate option like now should also to be there)
2. Every time refreshing after generation is time consuming, after generation auto refresh would be good
3. Chrome Extension & Android/iOS Apps

I'm surprised there aren't more reviews for this product. If you make YouTube videos, you need this. VidChapter works FAR BETTER than YouTube's built-in chapter creation tool and other 3rd parties I've tried. This product does its job extremely well, fast, and most importantly it's fast and easy to use. It's worth trying this one out, and there's no reason why you dont need this. I'm loving it and thanks for a great product, VidChapter!

I've had the app for the first day and I have to say I'm pretty excited about it. It still has some bugs, but I hope those will be ironed out in time.

This is a very useful product. The upload as well as the time to generate content (title, tags, videochapters etc) is very fast, so that it is fun to work with it.

Titles, video description, tags and chapter titles are all SEO optimized and are correctly corresponding to the content of the video.

Different languages (German in my case) are no problem, they are supported in the UI of the program itself, in the language of the video source and in the output (input language and output language are the same, the Vichapter UI can be set independent).

The UI is very easy and intuitive to use, the welcome video explains everything very clearly.

My only problem I have with the software is that the time stamps are not accurate in their timing, here manual adjustment (some times over several minutes in a 1:30 hour video) are necessary. Also, at least in one case, the software "halucinated" a subchapter that it correctly identified later in the video another time in the middle of the video.

However, the division of the video in subchapters and their optimum naming is useful as such, so that i am ready to live with that for now (and hope that it gets fixed).