I understand the concern about content being 'flagged' but the one hill I’ll die on is this: AI detector tools are unreliable, and always will be (and they're just getting worse).

And I'm not just saying that to shrug off the concern. Just look up AI detectors on reddit forums or news and scroll through the endless research, shared, experiences, reviews, etc..

1) Even OpenAI publicly stated: AI detectors do not work reliably and shut down their own AI detector after finding it had only a 26% accuracy rate (and that's OpenAI!!!)

Because if there really were an accurate AI detector (meaning a model that could reliably identify AI generated text) then AI developers will just build an AI that keeps tweaking its text output until it “beats” the detector, rendering the detector useless. It’s a paradox that's based in real machine learning dynamics but no is really talking about...

2) On “duplicated content”: sometimes “AI detection tools” confuse certain phrases or content structures as being “duplicate” or “AI-like,” especially if they are using generic or pattern-based scanning (which most AI detection tools do).. BUT this doesn’t mean the content is plagiarized, nor does it mean it will hurt you in search rankings.

Google isn't using Ai detection tools to scan your content (I mean they are betting a lot on AI) and said it themselves: “AI-generated content is not penalized as long as it's helpful and high-quality.”

So I personally am not really sure why people are still focused on AI detection scores (when we know most content now is generated by AI) instead of focusing on being the human in the loop and making the necessary edits to personalize and humanize their drafts further.

You said your vocable output gets 75% scoring so I tested multiple pieces of Vocable content in leading AI detectors (like ZeroGPT first..then compared one piece's scoring from others like Grammarly and Winston AI), and saw wildly inconsistent results. ZeroGPT flagged articles and posts are 94-100% human written and another flagged the most human-sounding lines as AI. It’s a mess.
See for yourself: https://www.loom.com/share/f55d90040c4e4d35b448c3f6d0556ab0#Edit and https://www.loom.com/share/ef83c008212e4159a54e896bd23edab5#Edit

That said, we are exploring ways to help improve post-processing, like optional “naturalizer” tools, SEO optimizers, and rewriters to make content feel more personal and less robotic if needed. But no, we won’t be building an “AI detection bypass” feature because the detectors themselves aren’t valid enough to warrant that.

Hope this clears things up! We're always open to improving the product with useful suggestions.