At first I gave it 2 stars. I am now improving it to 3 stars because I was pointed at a function that existed, which helped to improve the text quality. The review is written after I generated 6 articles.

Attention! The review does not cover the integration between the generator and WP becuase I did not test it.

1. The articles produced by the generator are essentially of poor quality BUT this can be improved by providing custom prompts. You need to provide the style that you expect to get and the level of language complexity you aim at. After the changes, the style is much better. I found that the select fields for changing the style of text do not work (or at least not for the content I tried to generate)

2. The chain of thoughts of the articles is lacking - the sentences are sometimes not linked and do not follow the usual order "from general to specific".

3. The UI of the generator needs some work. At the moment it seems very fresh.

In my opinion the tools is still fresh and needs a lot of work but if the developers keep updating it, it may become a priactical tool for generating starter content for a new site. At the moment the generated texts need a lot of manual correction.