Disappointing Experience with WriteRank: Poor User Experience and Generic Outputs
After a year of use, my experience with WriteRank has been disappointing. The tool presents an extremely poor user experience, making its use frustrating, unintuitive, and quite cumbersome. The interface is horrible, with an outdated and confusing design that does not facilitate navigation or task execution at all.
Navigation through the documents generated via card blocks is horrible. It was suggested to support to add a list mode a year ago.
The date when the available words are renewed is not indicated (and if you haven't used them, you lose them). It was also suggested to support a year ago.
It also doesn't indicate the sites connected by the plugin, and you have to think carefully about which sites to use because you won't be able to unlink it later to use it on another site.
As for the texts it generates, they are very ordinary and lack the quality expected from a tool of this kind. The results are usually generic and do not stand out in terms of creativity or accuracy, which limits their usefulness.
Additionally, the improvements suggested by users, many of which are simple and clearly necessary, have not been implemented. This lack of response and updates from the development team is a clear sign of the little attention paid to user satisfaction and product evolution.
In summary, WriteRank does not meet expectations either in terms of user experience or the quality of its texts, and the lack of improvements is a serious issue that further affects its usefulness. I do not recommend this tool at all.
Another tool that quickly disappeared. Very disappointing
Updated review: this tool is now dead. Great disappointment that it lasted so short. Even though it wasn't extraordinary, it still helped create some content. Short-lived apps are becoming more and more frequent here.
[original review] Terrible UI, lack of information, poor support
I tried the WordPress plugin and, despite its terrible UI, it kind of works. I was able to create some posts in different areas, with reasonable quality content, not many delirious text. Not sure why it's using the old classic editor and the way it generates titles and headings. Most of the time the image it picks as featured image is nonsense.
The WriteRank site and dashboard, however, is a different story. The UI/UX is terrible, information is lacking as to connected websites (and I'm getting an error connecting a new site, despite I have a 3 sites limit and not having it active in 3 sites yet).
Support is absent.
In general, the experience is not good. It promises but doesn't deliver. If I could I would definitely ask for my money back.
The creator of this software is a young and talented Spanish entrepreneur, an SEO expert and known in my country for having been able to create successful websites at a very young age. I knew him from his YouTube channel and from various interviews on other recognized SEO channels. He had already heard about Escríbelo, the Spanish version, and its multiple uses. For this reason, when I found out that it was in Appsumo, I bought level 3 of this tool a month ago. I have used it on several occasions and find it very useful. The text output it offers seems very good to me. In my case, yes, I have not installed the plugin, since I prefer to use it together with Neuron. But knowing that one day, if I prefer, I can create content quickly, seems like a no-brainer to me.
Verified purchaser
Disappointment
No support and let the tooling die, zero update, obsolete today.
Share WriteRank
Verified purchaser
Disappointing Experience with WriteRank: Poor User Experience and Generic Outputs
After a year of use, my experience with WriteRank has been disappointing. The tool presents an extremely poor user experience, making its use frustrating, unintuitive, and quite cumbersome. The interface is horrible, with an outdated and confusing design that does not facilitate navigation or task execution at all.
Navigation through the documents generated via card blocks is horrible. It was suggested to support to add a list mode a year ago.
The date when the available words are renewed is not indicated (and if you haven't used them, you lose them). It was also suggested to support a year ago.
It also doesn't indicate the sites connected by the plugin, and you have to think carefully about which sites to use because you won't be able to unlink it later to use it on another site.
As for the texts it generates, they are very ordinary and lack the quality expected from a tool of this kind. The results are usually generic and do not stand out in terms of creativity or accuracy, which limits their usefulness.
Additionally, the improvements suggested by users, many of which are simple and clearly necessary, have not been implemented. This lack of response and updates from the development team is a clear sign of the little attention paid to user satisfaction and product evolution.
In summary, WriteRank does not meet expectations either in terms of user experience or the quality of its texts, and the lack of improvements is a serious issue that further affects its usefulness. I do not recommend this tool at all.
Share WriteRank
Verified purchaser
Another tool that quickly disappeared. Very disappointing
Updated review: this tool is now dead. Great disappointment that it lasted so short. Even though it wasn't extraordinary, it still helped create some content. Short-lived apps are becoming more and more frequent here.
[original review]
Terrible UI, lack of information, poor support
I tried the WordPress plugin and, despite its terrible UI, it kind of works. I was able to create some posts in different areas, with reasonable quality content, not many delirious text. Not sure why it's using the old classic editor and the way it generates titles and headings. Most of the time the image it picks as featured image is nonsense.
The WriteRank site and dashboard, however, is a different story. The UI/UX is terrible, information is lacking as to connected websites (and I'm getting an error connecting a new site, despite I have a 3 sites limit and not having it active in 3 sites yet).
Support is absent.
In general, the experience is not good. It promises but doesn't deliver. If I could I would definitely ask for my money back.
Share WriteRank
Verified purchaser
A very useful tool to create posts
The creator of this software is a young and talented Spanish entrepreneur, an SEO expert and known in my country for having been able to create successful websites at a very young age. I knew him from his YouTube channel and from various interviews on other recognized SEO channels. He had already heard about Escríbelo, the Spanish version, and its multiple uses. For this reason, when I found out that it was in Appsumo, I bought level 3 of this tool a month ago. I have used it on several occasions and find it very useful. The text output it offers seems very good to me. In my case, yes, I have not installed the plugin, since I prefer to use it together with Neuron. But knowing that one day, if I prefer, I can create content quickly, seems like a no-brainer to me.
Share WriteRank
Verified purchaser
AI content will not rank
Copyleaks detects 100% of the generated text as AI generated.
So I think this could never rank well on Google or Bing.
Will make some more tests, but with 100% detected I'm not expecting this could deliver far better results.
And editing long text agian and again, until they will no longer be detected as AI, will take more time as to write them myself :(
Share WriteRank