Editor.do Reviews

As advertised and Imho fantastic deal. I say this as seasoned software developer who knows many ways to deploy static sites for free. I redeemed my code and within 5 mins had angular app working under a custom domain with SSL. As it worked so well for me I decided to quickly check if the things in the negative reviews were actually true. 1MB code file limit (non code files 50mb) exist but honestly that should just be your warning you likely doing something wrong. You can fit angular, react, and vue in a single file and still have it be like 500kb. Favicons for the web, and app icons for iOS / Android work just fine, manifest files work correctly. There are tons of templates so can't speak to how well those are all coded, but nothing about the editor.do would prevent a mobile app or PWA. My little test site looks fantastic on my phone. Files are served with correct MIME types and reasonable caches, if you don't see an immediate update it's just your browsers local cache which is the nature of the internet your browser and your code not really an editor.do problem. Ctrl+f5 is your friend. IMHO this fits perfectly in a niche, I have dozens of options for stackblitz like tools with virtualized build systems etc.. in a world of dev, staging, prod repos, CI, runners and actions, quite refreshing to go back to the old days and just quickly make edits in "production".

I'm sort of forcing myself to use it to make my purchase worthwhile, but it doesn't seem to be improving unfortunately.

I wish it was something that was actively developed and improved, but it seems it is not the case.

good but limited to max 1MB per code file

I'm not sure whether the other commentors (especially the ones with low rating) had the right expectation.
For me it's an online IDE. There's no support for "I don't know CSS, help me to style the button". That's not what the product is intended for.

It's like Visual Basic oder Dreamweaver in the cloud with hosting included.
I did some projects with it and I even used the hosting, which is fast and reliable.

It's an awesome tool.
I'd personally wish there would be more options to rearrange, reorganize files (multiselect and so on)... But if you know what you're doing and are dev-oriented it really works great.

It does what it says it does and that for a very nice price.
Grab it while you can!

Editor.do has enormous potential, especially for those who aren’t developers but want to start building projects with the help of AI. However, the execution leaves much to be desired: too many features don’t work as they should, and the support doesn’t seem up to the task.

I’ll give it a few more days, but the fact that I couldn’t even configure my OpenAI API key is already a major issue. If this feature worked flawlessly, the tool would already be useful for simple projects.

What really pushed me to buy it was its potential. If it evolved into something like bolt.new (which I love, but it burns through credits at lightning speed), it would be an amazing tool. But so far, it doesn’t seem like the developers are interested in taking it to that level.

If I don’t see improvements or at least a clear roadmap within the trial period, I’ll have no choice but to request a refund. I hope the team steps up and takes Editor.do to the level its concept deserves.