Editor.do performs all the functions mentioned above, so I would definitely recommend it to anyone who wants to create static websites and practice coding.

As for hosting and management of content, I didn't find any problems. In fact, I liked the speed of work and the dark theme. However, I would like to draw attention to the fact that the way of working with files is not convenient, as they cannot be moved between folders and copied to other projects or deleted all in one click. This also applies to downloading projects from Github, which cannot be unzipped directly to the root or specific folder. Also, there is no preview of the main files and no editing of csv in the form of tables.

As for the IDE, I was expecting it to be more of a tablet experience, but it's not a complete replacement for PC with Visual Studio or JetBrains tools, which have a plugin store and additional services. I still haven't figured out how to write something for Python and use it later. It would be nice to have synchronization with third-party services, like Google Drive, and then run it on Google Collab.

In the end, I would like to see that https://editor.do/terms includes the information mentioned in the answers to the questions from the Appsumo community.

I think that the tool is worthy of attention, and the openness of Chris suggests that it has a high chance of further success.