LazyLeadz Reviews

4.2

4.23 stars
4.23 stars
65

Taco ratings

47
2
5
6
5
AskSumo

LazyLeadz is appreciated by customers for its user-friendly interface, fast lead generation, and responsive support. However, some users have reported limitations in filtering options and occasional glitches. With an overall rating of 4.2 and 65 reviews, it's a promising tool for SMBs. Additionally, with a 60-day money-back guarantee, it's worth giving it a try.

AI-powered summary of customer reviews
Showing 1 - 20 of 65 reviews
Verified Purchaser badge

Verified purchaser

Member since: Oct 2021Deals bought: 428
5 stars
5 stars
Posted: May 3, 2025

Simple, easy, and insanely helpful

Simple, easy, and insanely helpful. The community inside Lazy Lead Empire on Skool is next-level. You can tell this team is in it for the long haul.

Founder Team
JeremyRedmanIsLazy

JeremyRedmanIsLazy

May 7, 2025

Thanks smooth!!! Really appreciate it! Simple review for a simple platform ;) gotta love that huh? Helps motivate the team. We appreciate it

Helpful?
Share
WaSumoWaSumoPLUS
Verified Purchaser badge

Verified purchaser

Member since: Nov 2024Deals bought: 14
3 stars
3 stars
Posted: Apr 30, 2025

Not good for refined searches within specific industries

First, I want to highlight that the support is responsive and genuinely invested in helping users. I believe the product has the potential to improve over time. However, it currently yields minimal results—usually just one contact, if I’m lucky—for my searches. The 30-minute wait between searches makes it difficult to assess its effectiveness for my needs.

I purchased Tier 2 to evaluate the product before considering an upgrade, but the lack of filtering options limits my ability to find useful contacts, and the wait time makes it extremely difficult to keep trying to work around limitations.

In higher tiers, users can search more frequently and perhaps try different keywords in searches. In contrast, at Tier 2, I often receive no contacts and must endure a 30-minute wait before attempting another search. Even after searching across the entire U.S. or within a specific city, I frequently find only one contact without an email, followed by another long wait to try again—and this obviously isn't a true reflection of actual Google results, but a reflection of LazyLeadz not obtaining the leads you'd expect due to whatever limiting factors it has.

If I were receiving results from my searches (meaning seeing results that a Google search would yield), the long wait would be less of a concern, but the combination of no results and extended wait times makes the product unusable for me and makes me wonder how/if it works—being unable to test further for myself.

While it might work for general searches like "barber" or "gym," I need a specific subset/keyword of an industry, which is currently unattainable since no results are generated (and is not available in B2B or other searches due to very general/limited filtering). Again, the wait time prevents me from trying workarounds. (I do wait and try, but on a second or third attempt, I get similar results, and I can't sit in front of the screen all day like this.)

For example, health and wellness (in the B2B search) is a very broad segment, and it cannot be filtered further, making it unhelpful to me. If I could add keywords, it might be viable, but I can't. Real-time searches using keywords often yield zero results for me, and the wait time stifles any further attempts. It seems real-time search is limited to basic keywords as mentioned, like "dentist" or "lawyer," which I can only assume works, not being able to try it myself (due to wait times and thus search opportunities being too precious to test what I don't need).

In summary, eliminating the wait time between searches would enable me to determine if I can work around the current filtering limitations. As it stands, while some users might find success using general terms in specific cities (?), those requiring more refined and detailed searches may find the product unsuitable.

I wish the LazyLeadz team all the best and eventual success. I'd like to invest in this team if the product worked for more granular searches.

Founder Team
JeremyRedmanIsLazy

JeremyRedmanIsLazy

Apr 30, 2025

Yeah!! Hey thanks for this. We def focus on the simplicity of it all, which might come at the cost of ultra specific options like you say! But we improve quite quickly ;) thanks for being a part of it

Helpful?
Share
Verified Purchaser badge

Verified purchaser

Member since: Jan 2022Deals bought: 30
5 stars
5 stars
Posted: Apr 26, 2025

So easy, quick updates

Couldn't be easier to use.. in fact, it's almost too easy. I'm still getting used to how to best search as I am used to having to use all kinds of granular functions to get results I want.

Development team is great and pushes updates all the time and very responsive to user needs.

Founder Team
JeremyRedmanIsLazy

JeremyRedmanIsLazy

Apr 28, 2025

muireadhach - we really appreciate this!!! I tried tirelessly to make it incredibly simple. Harder than it looks lol. So I’m truly glad you took notice ;) you got it! Thanks for being a part of the lazy empire!

Helpful?
Share
eyiinceyiincPLUS
Verified Purchaser badge

Verified purchaser

Member since: Jul 2018Deals bought: 414
5 stars
5 stars
Posted: Apr 25, 2025

TaskMagic Believer - Lazy Leadz White Label All The Way

Leads are the life blood of my business model. I'm the founder of https://MAPB2B.com/free I purchased Task Magic when it launched. I have 100% faith in Jeremy Redman, his committment to helping people succeed is second to none. When Jeremy announced LazyLeadz it was the answer to prayer. The LazyLeadz White label will give me the ability to supply my team with Leads. For my business model this is a critical component, the leads they get will help my team members achieve online success faster. What I do know and believe is that Leadz will continue to grow and improve and in the future people that don't grab it will be wishing they did.

Founder Team
JeremyRedmanIsLazy

JeremyRedmanIsLazy

Apr 26, 2025

Heyyyyyy!!! Thanks so much! We love the love! If you’ve gotten high tiers on each…remind me to give you a little extra for the next product! Just let me or the team know ;) I LOVE that this was the answer to some prayers lol. Thanks for sharing!

Helpful?
Share
Verified Purchaser badge

Verified purchaser

Member since: Feb 2021Deals bought: 204
2 stars
2 stars
Posted: Apr 24, 2025

Limitations with the platform. Needs improving.

We ran numerous search requests, using different filtering sequences, and gathered sufficient information to determine that the platform is not a good fit for us at this time.

I want to give Jeremy and his team some latitude, as they have been very responsive and are building a solution that I hope will improve, allowing us to consider using the portal for our use case in the future.

That said, the portal is more problematic and counterintuitive for our workflow.

Likes:
1.) Phone number extraction: Phone numbers are virtually 100% and included with most companies listed in an extraction.
2.) Contact search: Near 100% accuracy when verifying contact profiles in LinkedIn.
3.) Addresses included in the real-time search sequences.

Dislikes:
1.) Limited filtering options:
2.) Limited number of extractions (B2B) - (set at 200 max), making it cumbersome when going back sequentially to pull all contacts in a search of hundreds or thousands.
3.) Limited content extracted: Depending on the filter, you get different column counts. Examples:
a) B2B: Using industry and Employee size filters, the total number of columns (7) includes company, domain, employee subset, LinkedIn Company URL, and emails. Limited content is included depending on the column.
b) Realtime Search; the total number of columns (13). Nice report! :) When we tested the first 25 companies in LinkedIn Sales Navigator, half had 0-10 employees, with only one exceeding 100 employees, and the rest were not registered in LinkedIn at all.
c.) B2B: Companies domain search - We attempted to narrow our search by adding a block of domains. An error message would continually pop up so we could never test the accuracy or content provide in the search.

Recommendations for improvement:
1.) Chrome extension needs to be functional (Never worked with any of the tests we ran)
2.) Add subsets to the industry filter i.e. Finance (Subset: Banking), Health and Fitness (Subset: Hospitals, Mental Health, medical devices), etc.
3.) Filter by location: Include counties along and cities.
4.) B2B: Companies domain search - We attempted to narrow our search by adding a block of domains. An error message would continually pop up so we could never test the accuracy or content provide in the search.
5.) Realtime and People search need more filtering options
5.) Searching sequence needs to run faster

Conclusion: This tool has considerable potential. Based on the current feature sets, this platform is well-suited for targeting SMBs (1-100 Empl). For those who sell upmarket, there are limitations to content pooled in the searches. As I stated in the beginning, there are some real benefits such as phone number extraction, accurate profile searches, and addresses identified by company. This tool would be a huge addition to our tool box once it fits our requirements.

Founder Team
JeremyRedmanIsLazy

JeremyRedmanIsLazy

Apr 26, 2025

You know we improve every day ;) never a dull day in the lazy community, Sheldon! Stay tuned

Helpful?
Share