Have been doing a lot of research and testing on this tool. I bought it back when it launched and for 6 days I could not log in. It was very unfortunate for the developers.

Now that I have tested it, I quite like it. A lot of praise had been given to Frase, NeuralText seems like a solid competitor. It seems the interface in Frase is more polished and well formatted but NeuralText is doing pretty much the same thing, but with AI writing tools too!

Some say NT is a jack of all trades, master of none. I am not a super-user so I might be missing out on some details, but I have some doubts about how valid that sentiment is. It seems to me NT IS doing what Frase does with content briefs. It isn't far doing far less, it is doing a similar enough job that to me they do a comparable job with content briefs. Though I could be wrong.

With the AI tools, I still find it a bit clunky and have to jump around several AI tools to get what I wanted. The worst part of the experience for me so far is how NT forces me to type more before it helps me generate content. This limit seems arbitrary. For example, I started with a paragraph and NT can help me write some stuff. I didn't like what it wrote so I wanted to try again to expand on the same paragraph, but now it says it needs me to type more before I can generate something else? I can keep generating long form in other AI writers but here I am locked out and forced to write, even if I just wanted to get some variants...? As it stands right now I can see myself using NT the same way Frase works: with the help of another AI writer.