On June 16th you wrote under my review: "feedback is being taken into account. We’re actively working on deploying token usage efficiencies. Once that is done, we’ll then look at making these features available on other plans, so users can try everything. And also, users like you who use the tool occasionally can then still access these powerful features when they need them."
Sadly, Poorlygraf seems to be stuck at it's limited functionality. Moreover, since writing my review, I've tested the AI Detector on some of my original writings from 20 years ago and I'm told they're AI generated? Linguix, a popular spelling-grammar checking LTD from AppSumo, easily detects "humanized" text from Poorlygraf as "AI-generated." What gives?
Q: Clarification on Token Refresh Schedule for Lifetime Tier 1 (Standard)
Hi, Could you please clarify when the 150,000 monthly tokens for the Lifetime Tier 1 (Standard) plan are refreshed? Is it on the 1st of each month or based on the original purchase date?
I agree with the comments that have been made. If we go by the purchase date, the tokens should have already been reset. However, it has now been over a week, and my account still has not received the 150,000 tokens back. I would like an explanation regarding this matter.
It is not based on when you paid but based on when you activated. Tokens are automatically reset on monthly basis, from the day that you have activated your account.
E.g. purchased on the 5th, activated on the 19th, it will be reset on the 19th of each month.
Q: Bug in my profile settings
When going into your account settings-> profile and selecting the "which category best describes you", this bug appears.
Something went wrong! Show error:
right-hand side of 'in' should be an object, got null
"How can I resolve this issue?" (Apologies for this question, the sumo modbot now requires these questions)
Hi J_H, this issue should be resolved now. Thanks for bringing it to our attention!
Q: Free trial review
It's not bad, I like the source detector. The AI detector also does it's job somewhat ok-ish.
I did 3 ai detection, about 500 words and 3000 characters each. They used up around 600 to around 500 credits for the detection. For the first one, it was fully AI generated by ChatGPT, I got a 93.70% confirmation rate, and source detector was OpenAI, no questions there. For the second one, I changed it and added mimimal human text, I got a 72.10% AI generated. Again, no issues and works perfectly. But for the last test, I used an AI humanizer tool and immediately, the tool put it as 11.95% AI generated. This was a huge jump so I think the devs might have to work a bit on that. But again, the tool is good enough to use when you need a "quick is this AI check" before you submit something w/o the need to purchase premium plans of GPTZero.
A: Thanks for the detailed review! Our models are continuously evolving to keep pace with new humanizers (which also evolve) so you will see improvements on that front. Again, thanks for considering Polygraf and giving us a shot!
@J_H: I see this similar and have same false/positive results as well. Overal I think the system gets better and hopefully will learn to improve the AI detector and humanizer. Kepp up the good work @Vignesh_PolygrafAI :)
Q: History Function [BETA] wants to delete the selected history.
History Function [BETA] I would like your help to improve it so that users can select specific items to delete or choose to delete all.
Q: Any progress on Poorlygraf?
On June 16th you wrote under my review: "feedback is being taken into account. We’re actively working on deploying token usage efficiencies. Once that is done, we’ll then look at making these features available on other plans, so users can try everything. And also, users like you who use the tool occasionally can then still access these powerful features when they need them."
Sadly, Poorlygraf seems to be stuck at it's limited functionality. Moreover, since writing my review, I've tested the AI Detector on some of my original writings from 20 years ago and I'm told they're AI generated? Linguix, a popular spelling-grammar checking LTD from AppSumo, easily detects "humanized" text from Poorlygraf as "AI-generated." What gives?
Share Polygraf AI
Q: Clarification on Token Refresh Schedule for Lifetime Tier 1 (Standard)
Hi,
Could you please clarify when the 150,000 monthly tokens for the Lifetime Tier 1 (Standard) plan are refreshed? Is it on the 1st of each month or based on the original purchase date?
Thanks!
Yagub_PolygrafAI
Jul 19, 2025A: It is every month on the day that you activated your account.
E.g. purchased on the 5th, activated on the 19th, it will be reset on the 19th of each month.
Share Polygraf AI
I agree with the comments that have been made. If we go by the purchase date, the tokens should have already been reset. However, it has now been over a week, and my account still has not received the 150,000 tokens back. I would like an explanation regarding this matter.
Good question.
It is not based on when you paid but based on when you activated. Tokens are automatically reset on monthly basis, from the day that you have activated your account.
E.g. purchased on the 5th, activated on the 19th, it will be reset on the 19th of each month.
Q: Bug in my profile settings
When going into your account settings-> profile and selecting the "which category best describes you", this bug appears.
Something went wrong! Show error:
right-hand side of 'in' should be an object, got null
"How can I resolve this issue?" (Apologies for this question, the sumo modbot now requires these questions)
Vignesh_PolygrafAI
Jun 17, 2025A: Thanks for bringing this to our attention - our engineering team is looking into the issue and we will revert to you shortly.
Share Polygraf AI
Hi J_H, this issue should be resolved now. Thanks for bringing it to our attention!
Q: Free trial review
It's not bad, I like the source detector. The AI detector also does it's job somewhat ok-ish.
I did 3 ai detection, about 500 words and 3000 characters each. They used up around 600 to around 500 credits for the detection. For the first one, it was fully AI generated by ChatGPT, I got a 93.70% confirmation rate, and source detector was OpenAI, no questions there. For the second one, I changed it and added mimimal human text, I got a 72.10% AI generated. Again, no issues and works perfectly. But for the last test, I used an AI humanizer tool and immediately, the tool put it as 11.95% AI generated. This was a huge jump so I think the devs might have to work a bit on that. But again, the tool is good enough to use when you need a "quick is this AI check" before you submit something w/o the need to purchase premium plans of GPTZero.
Vignesh_PolygrafAI
Jun 17, 2025A: Thanks for the detailed review! Our models are continuously evolving to keep pace with new humanizers (which also evolve) so you will see improvements on that front. Again, thanks for considering Polygraf and giving us a shot!
Share Polygraf AI
@J_H: I see this similar and have same false/positive results as well. Overal I think the system gets better and hopefully will learn to improve the AI detector and humanizer. Kepp up the good work @Vignesh_PolygrafAI :)
Q: History Function [BETA] wants to delete the selected history.
History Function [BETA] I would like your help to improve it so that users can select specific items to delete or choose to delete all.
Vignesh_PolygrafAI
Jun 17, 2025A: Hello, this is an upcoming feature under the 'History' tab. Our engineering team is working on it, and it will be available in the near term.
Share Polygraf AI