Review: My Experience with Streann Studio (Tier 3)

I’ve been thoroughly testing Streann Studio for several days now, and as someone who works in education and live streams for more than 4-5 hours a day, I needed a platform that can handle heavy usage. Here’s my detailed experience with the program:

1. Live Streaming
The live streaming feature works, but it requires using RTMP. With RTMP, I can connect and add multiple channels for streaming, which works well for my needs. However, the direct connection to social media platforms sometimes works and sometimes doesn’t. Personally, as I primarily work on a computer, I can accept this limitation and will continue using the platform.

2. My Channel and Fee System
For the My Channel feature, the team has informed me that Tier 3 users will only be charged a 10% fee. Although the current fee calculation in the system still shows 20%, they assured me that the actual charge will be 10% when processed. I trust them to resolve this issue soon, even though I haven’t tested it further yet.

3. Customization and Graphics
The platform provides solid customization tools, including graphics, intros, and outros, which are very helpful for my content. This is a feature I find particularly satisfying as it aligns with my professional needs.

4. Guest Invitation
I tested the guest invitation system, and it works flawlessly (via RTMP). I especially appreciate how easy it is for guests to join without the need for lengthy sign-up processes. They only need to provide an email and a code to access the system.

5. Mobile Responsiveness
The responsiveness of the My Channel page on mobile devices needs improvement. At times, logos appear blurry or out of proportion, and some elements aren’t properly aligned. I believe the team will address this issue soon.

6. Custom Domain
This feature is excellent. Setting up my custom domain was straightforward, and I was able to have my custom domain ready in no time.
However, I encountered a technical limitation with SSL. When setting up SSL in Cloudflare, enabling the proxy creates a restriction: while I received SSL for my custom domain, I had to revert to non-custom domain settings for live streaming to function properly.
If the development team could implement internal SSL support, it would greatly improve the experience. Nonetheless, this is a minor inconvenience, and I’m still happy to use the platform.

7. User Guidance and Support
The platform could benefit from better user documentation. I often had to wait for one-on-one responses from the development team to resolve issues. It would be far more efficient if there were updated guides, videos, or resources created by real users to help navigate the platform.

Conclusion
Overall, I’m satisfied with Streann Studio and will continue using it. I see great potential in this platform and appreciate the efforts of the development team. I apologize if I’ve been overly persistent with my questions and feedback—it’s because I genuinely believe in this product and have high expectations for its future.

If you need real-world user insights, I’d be happy to share my experience to help you improve the platform. Please feel free to reach out.

Thank you and best regards! 😊