I started testing Table and must say I absolutely love the design. The tables are super fast, way faster than Clay, for instance, and I found it super useful.

For example, I'm currently in the process of hiring an additional employee. I gave it some screenshots of candidate names, asked it to make a table including different status columns, and it did a good job within seconds. It only cost ten or twenty credits, so this was super efficient.

Besides that, at least in the table view, you can do a lot of things even without credits. In other reviews, I read that people are asking the chat to add a column with a drop-down field of different options, but you can also do it manually by adding the column and selecting the right format.

For me, it's also a good way to quickly show clients data sets that I prepare in another software. I quickly download and upload the CSV into Table and can show it there.

What I don't like is the current credit system. I do not believe that credit usage is static or linear. I believe that people and users will use it differently each month. I can understand that you can't roll over all the credits forever because then you will not have a sustainable business model. But what I would expect is that people on a tier three or tier four plan should be able, every once in a while, to build an application with the given credits. In order to do so, I think credits should accumulate to two or three times the monthly volume. So when the user is going into a builder phase and wants to build a new app, they can actually do it without having to pay for additional credits.

Currently on Tier-3. Would upgrade to Tier-4 if I can be - more or less - sure that credits will be sufficient to build some apps in the future.