Texta.ai - The #1 WordPress Blog Automation / Article Writer / Autoblogging Reviews

I am a publisher and a long time app sumo customer. I LOVE THIS and I am so excited to finally have something like this on my side. The turn around time and quality are superb. This has completely changed my life.

The generated texts in the German language are a disaster. Errors in grammar – which is not a problem because you revise the generated texts. But the errors in content are then the point where I would not recommend for Texta.ai.

So easy to use and intuitive. Now the have added a simple longform just the title of your description and voila one article ready.

i for one are happy with the results it churns out

Texta.ai can help you save time and improve the quality of your final work especially when you your mind is clouded and ideas cannot be expressed in proper words. Texta.ai is the perfect choice to kick off writing! Among the many tools I bought and used, Texta.ai is probably one of the best investment.

I just tried it out and get some disappointing results, going to refund back soon and not sure which plan included here.
What I found into output, look here- https://prnt.sc/55d_cqNgOoTV

Asked a few questions didn't answer though, Should be more productive in quality, reply and so on.

I run the same tests with all AI writers to see what type of output it gives and it ranges from minor grammar mistakes to repeated sentences to sentences/paragraphs that make absolutely no sense. So, make sure you read ALL output text and edit as needed. This is true for all not just Texta or ArticleNinja.

Texta.ai tools:
The long form section has 13 blog post generators (most industry-specific, like Real Estate) BUT based on the tests I've ran, aside from minor variations, they were very similar in output. So I would group those as one tool.

Then you have Blog ideas, Blog Titles, Headline Generation, Blog Intro, Essay Intro, and Paragraph Generation. The Blog Titles and Headline Generation would consider the same tool and the intros and Paragraph Generation also be the same.

Short form tools: Product Description, Facebook Headlines, Video Title Generator, Ad Copy, Facebook Primary Text, Google Headlines, Google Description, LinkedIn Ads, Value Proposition, Brand Mission, Startup Ideas, Text Hook, Slogan Generator, Product Hunt launch, Video Titles, Video Intro Hook, Subheader Text, Meta Descriptions, Question Generator, Event Description, Marketing Strategy, Feature to Benefit.

Again, with short tools as well, different tools have similar results.

Email tools: Welcome, Follow up, Confirmation, and Thank you generated decent output.

ArticleNinja tools:
The main tool is their Article Writer, which generates titles, then generates outlines, and then article content.

Short form tools: Product Description, Facebook Primary Text, Facebook Listicle, Facebook Headlines, Google Headlines, Google Description, LinkedIn Ads, Ad Copy, Video Title Generator, Value Proposition, Slogan Generator, Brand Mission, Audience Refiner, Name Generator, Domain Name Generator, Startup Ideas, Video Titles, Text Hook, Subheader Text, Landing Page Hero Text, Microcopy, Meta Descriptions, Question Generator, Marketing Strategy, Problem-Agitate-Solution, Before-After-Bridge, Feature-Advantage-Benefit, Why/Try/Buy, AIDPPC, ACCA, QUEST Strategy, Feature to Benefit, AIDA Copywriting.

Like Texta, some tools overlap and are virtually the same.

So which should you go with?
Depends.

I found the Texta long form/blog generate output was better than ArticleNinja's Article Writer but you still need to read and edit most of it. ArticleNinja's output most of the time was complete non-sense.

Texta offers unlimited credits vs limited credits with ArticleNinja for long forms.

ArticleNinja offers more tools for sales copies than Texta.

If long forms are more important, Texta is a better choice.
If sales copies are more important, ArticleNinja is a better choice.

Personally, I won't keep either because it's odd to me that the company behind both is the same, and instead of sticking to one, they have competing products. It's just giving me the Botstar/Chative vibe, which a lot of people including myself got burned.

So here is a deal. In the trial, there is grammar correction and editor working and in this lifetime deal, these features are missing. Plus the quality from the official website is better compared to this app sumo deal. 3 taco because still waiting for devs to fix it. Otherwise 0 tacos and refund. I asked a question few days ago and still no answer. Unfortunately.

I saw a lot of those AI Writing tools and most of them were a real deception or very expensive. I got the chance to get a very early unlimited deal on another tool that is now one of the reference, but still is complex to use (powerful as well so).

Now, I was positively surprised to get an unlimited deal for such a price. I was not expect much quality, but I was wrong.

Not only the tool is providing good to outstanding quality, but the interface is REALLY very efficient.

Even so it is less powerful than the other tool I have. It is so straightforward that I will probably use that one more often than the other.

Only quick one remark... I'm very surprised that we can't get H3 sub-titles... it stops at H2. This is WAY TOO LIMITED and H3 should be a basic existing feature.

What is less intuitive is the SEO side of the tool. I did not understand where I get the SEO feature, if there is any.

But overall, I can't complain for that price, I clearly got much more value than expected. And the future of that tool looks pretty promising looking at what they have achieved till now.

Curious to see the roadmap when available... this is really a missing element to have a real view on Texta.ai future.

Textai permet de générer du texte rapidement et facilement. Le back-office est tres simple d'utilisation. Je l'utilise chaque semaine . Je génère du contenu pour mes sites. Et je fais aussi du contenu pour mes clients. Je recommande.

I have been using Texta for several months for my projects and I can assure you that the quality of the content is really good. You always have to review them manually, which is normal, but the labor savings are very high.

I bought the app one year ago and the app was working okay
However, now after many system updates they have improved the app and they add many more features, so the app becomes amazing.

If you're like me and you feel like you spend a lot of time collecting ideas and not actually putting them to use, then you need Texta.ai.
Texta.ai is a tool that can help you save a lot of time and improve the quality of your final work. So if you're looking for a tool that can help you produce better work, Texta.ai is the perfect choice for you! I am happy with this tool best quick blog post content

I have to produce articles on a regular basis. I like the idea that a tool such texta.ai can make me save a lot of time and improve the quality of my final work. If you think about it, even if you are a seasoned copywriter, you tend to spend a lot of time just by collecting ideas you have somewhere in your head.

Texta.ai makes me save a lot of time, as not only it generates ideas I have somewhere in my head, but it also generates ideas I genuinely didn't think about. The time and energy I save in that process allows me to be more creative.

This must be a true sumo of ai automated writing because its got some real ninja skills

Due to some big projects, it took me longer to start using Texta than I had hoped. But after I'd seen what it can do, I'm kicking myself for the delay! The generated content is good, but I usually end up reviewing and adding my own touches -- something you may or may not want to do. I didn't use earlier versions, so I can't compare, but I'm very happy with the interface/dashboard. I'm excited to see more improvements and surprises in the future.

With Texta.ai it is very easy to create full article content that makes sense at a push of a button. Also it is very easy to understand for newbies. I recommend it!

I used another AI (I won't name) and I always had a problem with unfinished sentences (very annoying) but their quality was good.

I tried Texta.ai and all the tests I ran gave me more subheading, more reading ease and more options... excellent, excellent, excellent.

I know the dev is still working on improvement, but it's worth every penny.

Go for it!

0 Support!
No answer from them for more than one week!

I do really like this tool and it saves time.

To give some context I am one of the owners of a small publishing house. We need content all the time. This app is going to help keep some of the costs down for that content creation and since the purchase of this app I’ve saved the cost of the price if paying someone to do the work.

It creates a framework for an article quickly and if you need articles on many subjects it does a decent job. As a creative I have found it’s limitations though. Mainstream articles that have a very loose speech it does great. Articles about subjects that require some knowledge about pop culture or things that are more factual the Ai can get lost and lose the subject or start becoming repetitive.

Here are a few examples that defeated the ai:

It decided that Harry Potter was written by JRR Tolkien… and some how decided that was appropriate when I asked it to write about vampires.

It some how turned at least three articles about novels/authors/books into investing in the stock market.

It also seems to love Tolkien because in an article it wrote about avoiding Sauron at the office.

My last serious complaint is that it writes extremely vague copy.

It’s still a good tool. I’ve been using it to come up with basic articles that I then scrap about half of it and rewrite. It definitely has limitations so don’t expect a magic wand, it’s worth the investment and time using the tool.

Overall this app is like having a high school intern work in the office. Sometimes it is really Impressive but most of the time it will need some help and if you are a small business any help is great.

It works great for me because I want to create a lot of content and have to little time to do.