The LLM Bundle I've Been Looking For!
I've tested far too many 'all-in-one' AI platforms to count, and I was hesitant to add yet another one to that list. All the AI platforms I've tested thus far have always had issues, bugs, or imposed context limitations that make me throw my hands up in frustration and want to move on. That said, I bit the bullet on Tier 2, and in my humble opinion, this one stands out as one of the best of the bunch that I've tested. It's not perfect, to be sure, but it's definitely one of the best I've used.
What I like:
a) Clean Interface
b) Ability to create multiple projects. Each project can have its own knowledge base/repository of files. Great if you juggle multiple clients. Keep everything (chat history, knowledge, etc) inside one folder for easy access or reference.
c) Agent Creation. Each agent can use its own chat model and utilize separate knowledge files, so they're like projects, but slightly more flexible.
d) Prompt Creation. Not as powerful as unique agents (above), but still nice to have - especially if you find yourself using the same prompt repeatedly.
e) Image and Video creation is a nice-to-have feature under the same 'roof' - both are solid, and they work, though I've run into issues where some image models toss a 'not found' error. However, this isn't my main use, so I consider it just icing on the cake.
f) generous token amounts per chat instance: many of the "all-in-one" models I've tested just stop mid-answer because I've bumped up against an arbitrary context threshold. Haven't found that to be the case here, and I've gotten some extremely detailed and lengthy responses to some of my questions.
g) BYOK. Great if the LTD ever becomes unviable.
h) Zapier Integration.
Dislikes:
a) I've found several bugs and glitches in the interface and with different workflows, which I've reported; I'm hopeful they'll be addressed, as the owner seems to be fairly responsive.
b) The help files aren't very useful - they're more of the "here's the feature" variety vs. "here's HOW to use this feature." I'd love to see useful documentation and real-life examples.
c) You have to jump to settings > usage to see your usage breakdown; I wish you could just pin 'usage' to the sidebar if you wanted. More of a minor niggle and not a deal breaker.
d) Others have commented on this, but it would be nice to see how many *daily* pro/ultimate credits you have remaining from the chat window itself vs. seeing your *monthly* remaining credits.
e) Model Shifting/Removal. One day I noted 20 ultimate models, the next there were 6. Some of them may have been bumped down to Pro - no idea. Again, I understand that models change, become cheaper or more expensive, new ones get released, old ones retire, etc. I just hope this stabilizes, and we don't arbitrarily see models from PRO suddenly move to ULTIMATE to keep costs down.
f) The compare mode. I like that you can run the same prompt against multiple LLMs, but toggling between the responses is a pain, and I wish there were a way to compare or summarize those multiple responses. As it is, you have to do that manually via copy/paste. Again, not a feature I was expecting or use very often. It's nice to have, but it currently feels like an afterthought.
In summary, there's a lot to love in this package. Current monthly limits seem more than fair - though you can easily burn through your daily allotment rather quickly - especially if you do a lot of writing. Again, I understand why those limits are in place, and I'd rather have that than an unstable, unreliable platform or one that goes out of business in a year. And honestly, if you need more credits, buy a higher tier - easy/peasy.
Final Words: I sincerely hope they can keep the platform running and financially viable under their monthly pricing plans once the AS deal expires, as it seems I may have found my go-to 'bundled AI' platform, and I'd hate to see them shut their doors after just a few months.
Definite thumbs up for now.
Artem_Writingmate
Edited Apr 16, 2026Thank you for writing this. I can tell you’ve actually spent time using the product across real workflows, and that kind of feedback means a lot to me personally.
I’m really glad the things we’ve put the most thought into, like Projects, Agents, reusable Prompts, longer context, BYOK, and Zapier, are coming through in a meaningful way for you. That’s the core of what I wanted this platform to be: flexible enough to fit real work, not just another AI tool with a long feature list.
I also appreciate the honesty about what’s not working well yet. The bugs, rough edges in certain workflows, weak how-to documentation, buried usage info, lack of daily credit visibility, model tier changes, and the compare mode experience are all fair criticisms. None of that is lost on me. I read this stuff closely, and it helps me see where the product still feels frustrating instead of helpful.
Your comment about long-term viability after the AppSumo deal is especially appreciated, because that’s something I think about constantly.
I’m not trying to build something flashy that disappears in six months. I’m trying to build something sustainable that people can actually rely on.
Thanks again for taking a chance on it, and for leaving a review that was both generous and honest. That’s the kind of feedback that genuinely helps me keep improving it.