I tried really a lot content creation tools and found several hyped big names to be working insufficiently.
Now, Yazo is also not a total perfect match for my requirements, but is somehow still producing the most usable output.
Personally, I find that Yazo wants so achieve too much and by doing that is loosing a bit focus. Let me explain: Yazo is providing the content creation options you would expect, like AI Writing, text paraphrasing and summarizing, and even options for unusual content like real estate listings. On the other hand, I feel that options like AIDA, SWOT Analysis, legal risk analysis, or cost optimization calculations are not really belonging in such tool. Of cause, a user shouldn't mind if such is included. But it feels random and by this immediately not super trustworthy. It makes me uncomfortable if these are all really well considered inclusions.
Instead, I would prefer to have more content creation options included like Facebook posts or URL-to-Post modules. Even more granular settings for the existing modules would be nice, e.g. defining the length of the output, or providing input for AI writing and including references to knowledge bases to be considered in the output (there is a way to create a 'brand voice' that will be considered, in my experience that will not have an impact on the result though). To me such options would be essential to generate quality output, because otherwise all content will just rely on standard internet sources like any other creation.

Nice is the combination with SEO Analysis and site auditing inside Yazo. Also not directly related to content creation, and these will only be a reference in Yazo and not my most trusted go-to tool for such task.

So, overall I feel strongly tempted to leave just a 4* review score because there are too many untouched improvement areas. There are some top contenders in that field and it should be easy to use such references to catch up in the future.
Despite the current shortcomings, I see the potential and in comparison with other content creation tools the output is still better. Some discoveries might only be due to my inexperienced use of the tool. Partially, that could be blamed on missing documentation or help features which are not available inside the dashboard (another simple improvement).