Q: Hi Aemal, how does this compare to QuickReviewer, which is a deal here in AppSumo too?
Aside from the CName, QuickReviewer doesn't allow comment on websites easily, which code is required to be inserted. However, it seems easier on Zooc. Hopefully, you could clarify more from the perspective of how Zooc is a better candidate to QuickReviewer. Thank you Aemal.

Aemal_Zooc
May 14, 2024A: Hello there,
I hope you are doing well.
Zooc has one Canvas, the video cavnas, that can be compared to QuickReviewer, the rest all of the features on Zooc are extra. For exmaple on QuickReviewer you can't send voice clips, video clips and screen recorded clips. Zooc is a collaboration tool and QuickReviewer is a video feedback tool more like frame.io.
We have a canvas called Live Website, that allows you to point and click and start a thread on any website. This isn't the case with QuickReviewer.
Sincerely,
Aemal Sayer
Hi Aemal, with your prompt response, I immediately got a code to try it out. I agree with your vision, this could be revolutionary. However, I believe you know this as well, the UI is still far from "usable", such as drag-and-drop, moving/delete the comment circle, the video timeline doesn't match well with the comment timestamp.
I'm using QuickReviewer for media collaboration, and Teams for my team communication. I would love to just use Zooc for these purposes, and stack up the codes, while sharing this great tool.
These are the following that stops me from "migrating" over:
- Guests (without signing up) access to the canvas / workspace
- CName, to retain professional image towards clients
- Versioning of media when revision is done, so may look through the previous version for difference.
- Comparing two different version side-by-side
- Annotation can't be saved / stay in its location within the timestamp
- Much UI bugs which is too much to detail here
Overall, I'm over the fence to refund and stick to my current tools, or stack up codes and grow with Zooc as it improves. I can understand these are hard to address right now, but so far I see that there is no clear roadmap. You could address these with your plan, else many others may just turn away without recognizing Zooc's potential.
So my question is, can you please address these and other issues that others have highlighted, in clear roadmap with your elaboration. Thanks, Aemal. I'm excited to see this yet there are too much uncertainty to remain hopeful.
Hello there,
I agree with most of what you wrote, but we are fixing bugs on daily basis and soon we will have most of the crucial parts fixed. I know our campaign didn't turn out as expected, but I interpret it with a positive attitude; I would love to grow with people like yourself who are supportive even if it is less. As an early stage startup, quality is more important than quantity for now. I can only improve the quality of this software witht he support and feedback of patient Sumolings.
We will release a roadmap this week and you can see most of the stuff that you might need to do the migration with some tentitive deadlines.
Sincerley,
Aemal Sayer