Fast Performance, Risky for JavaScript-Heavy Sites
BerqWP is impressive technology, but I would recommend it selectively.
Good fit:
static blogs
affiliate sites
simple marketing pages
users chasing Lighthouse scores
Riskier fit:
Elementor-heavy sites
custom HTML widgets
Forminator/interactive forms
JavaScript-dependent funnels
mission-critical lead generation pages
The plugin feels optimized primarily for benchmark performance, sometimes at the expense of runtime stability.
If your site depends heavily on forms and frontend interactivity, test extremely carefully — especially:
logged out
Firefox
Incognito
mobile browsers
before deploying it site-wide.
For my use case, reliability mattered more than another 8–10 PageSpeed points.
On top of this, the support response was slow, making quick resolutions harder.
Update to founder reply: I did try the 'smart', 'standard' and even 'blaze' mode, but the problem remained, and the support was nowhere on the scene. By the time they responded, I had opted for a refund. Couldn't risk my revenue-generating form from disappearing due to this glitch that kept recurring over 2 days.
Hamza_Mairaj
Edited May 19, 2026Sorry about the inconvenience. It seems you didn't read our "Getting Started" guide which clearly explains the Optimization Modes. If the "Turbo" optimization mode causes issues, the "Smart" optimization mode is designed to address compatibility issues with JavaScript heavy websites and it works 100% of the time.
You should read what you're buying.
Update: There's no risk involved. BerqWP comes with a "Sandbox" mode which ensures safe experience for your website visitors while you test the optimizations. We have also mentioned this in our documentation.