After a long test period, I would now like to award my 5 tacos.
The tool is on par with services such as FastPixel or combinations such as Shortpixel and good caching tools.
In the combination of CDN/image compression/caching, what you get here for your money is more than good value.
I have been designing websites since 1996 and have been working with Wordpress since around 2012. Caching has always been an issue and I have tested numerous tools extensively.

Why are there so many bad reviews here:
I had a few problems at the beginning where pages had the best results, but elements were missing when loading as long as the mouse had not moved. On a smartphone without interaction, this was usually more serious.
The support initially responded quickly, but in some parts the caching had to be toned down a bit. The values ​​were then below 90, which ran somewhat counter to the promise here.

Then the support stumbled a bit due to the many inquiries here about the offer. In combination, this may have put off one or two people.

What counts for me.
Currently, support is available again on a daily basis. It must be said quite clearly that this is a main component and requirement of BerqWP, that customers are really helped 1:1 when something goes wrong.

Optimizations to the algorithms are taking place almost constantly and the tool grows with every page that doesn't run perfectly right away.

Even the best tool can't get anything out of a really messed up page.

On the other hand, there are also pages here that climbed from 40/60 to 90+/100 for me – without any loading issue in the frontend. And here I had already used tools like Shortpixel and Powered Cache. Even FastPixel was a bit slower.

Conclusion after many words:

If you don't have a caching tool yet, you can use it.
If you don't have an image optimization tool yet, you can use it.
If you think a CDN is useful, you can use it.

If you need everything together, don't hesitate. I accessed it even though I have the lifetime subscription to Shortpixel AI. :)