4.2
Taco ratings
Customers appreciate Paperguide for its innovative features, user-friendly interface, and potential for streamlining research tasks. Some users have noted minor issues with the user interface and workflow, but overall, the feedback is positive. With a 4.3 overall rating and a 60-day money-back guarantee, it's worth giving Paperguide a try for those in need of a research assistant.
AI-powered summary of customer reviews
Verified purchaser
Not intuitive to use…
I could not figure out how to fell Papergiide to help me write a paper with the 30 references o have it… unless there is an instruction manual somewhere I do not foresee using it much.
Mallik_Paperguide
Dec 21, 2024Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your review. You can find all relevant product demo videos and help pages in the Help section in the bottom left corner (Click on Help Guide option in Help section).
Specific to writer features, you can check this video as well
https://www.loom.com/share/4f296a66b37049099e1693ccddb87c2c?sid=6590f9ce-1422-4632-82d8-fab24ed92681
Please do reach out to us through support (chat...
Share Paperguide
Verified purchaser
Currently the best in research assistant AI
Complete feature
Excellent development and roadmap
Multi user available
Export to Excel
Hopefully will matching features on Afforai and Notebook...
Mallik_Paperguide
Dec 21, 2024Hi. Thanks for your review. Really appreciate it. And yes, we are working to continuously improve the product further. You can check our changelog for latest feature updates and improvements
https://paperguidehelp.notion.site/Changelog-128980d21a2d805ea606c646e101fa26
Share Paperguide
Verified purchaser
What the Dr. ordered
This is beyond art and convenience. All my writing and research workflow runs smooths because of this tool. It is beyond perfection to me
Mallik_Paperguide
Dec 20, 2024Hi. Thank you for your review. Really appreciate it.
Share Paperguide
Verified purchaser
Overall, I think it's a strong start.
Although some users have noted its UI/UX shortcomings, I find this app already helpful for research and writing tasks. I give it 5 tacos. It's my go-to tool for research work, and I think it's promising for the future.
Mallik_Paperguide
Dec 12, 2024Hi,
Thank you for your review. Really appreciate it.
Share Paperguide
Verified purchaser
Getting there, but some issues still need to be ironed out.
I've been using Paperguide since I purchased it via AppSumo on the 31st of October. I would like to add some observations from using it. I'm on Tier 2.
I've also got Afforial, Socrates, IKI, and NotebookLM to compare against. My usage is for personal interests in health and medical, and professional services work research across technology and training.
Overall, it's a product with potential, and I hope it will develop into a well-rounded product in the future. However, I would like to comment on some user interface and workflow issues that cause a lot of friction in its use.
Starting with the home icon.
If you do an AI search, this is fine and brings up relevant papers with citations. However, at this point, there is really nowhere to go with it since it becomes a chat. I wasn't able to see a way to transfer this information, along with the citations and links, into a document. I could copy the result into a blank document, but then there weren't any linked citations. Also, the references section in the chat wasn't transferable.
The workaround would be to copy the result to a new document, then go back to the chat, add the citations, then back to the document, and then manually highlight each one in the document and then link them from the references manager side panel.
This then led me to the next shortcoming. I like to put my references in subfolders in the reference manager. My papers were in a subfolder. But there was no way to select that subfolder in the references manager subpanel of the writer. So I could only work from a main folder. So the work around was to move the paper into the first level folder above, go back to the document, refesh the view, then seen the paper. I can then use it to cite a reference. This is very problematic if you have a lot of documents to scroll through.
Now with a competitive product called Afforial, its document writer can open its, research assistant, and show me my previous conversations. I can then choose the response and add it to the document with references included. These references don’t even have to be added to my reference library. However, it does give an option to do this when hovering over the citation.
The reference icon.
I've noticed that some documents fail to upload and process, whereas I know that in other systems like Afforial, Socrates, IKI, and NotebookLM, the same file is not a problem. However, they have finally uploaded after a retry.
You can add video links, and while it doesn't add the transcript, you are able to use the AI summary tools on it. I did a bunch, and it worked well. Now revisiting the same links, all the AI summary information has been wiped. Also, the feature is not working for any item in my reference manager.
On a few occasions, when I’m in a folder and select all the files, and then use the chat with paper feature, it transfers over to the chat, but I noticed on some occasions that it pulled a lot more documents into the chat than what I had selected. I had to delete the chat and start again.
My workbooks.
Being able to rename your workbooks should be a fundamental feature to help you organize.
Also, there isn’t an easy way to transfer the results in a table cell elsewhere, like a document. There should be some sort of transfer or scratch pad.
My chats.
Again, no way to rename a chat for better organization.
YouTube videos work well with chats, and you can get a transcript and chat with them; again, a save to references feature for the transcript might be useful.
However, I notice a few times that prompts don’t seem to be as effective. Sometimes it says it doesn’t have access to the content, and you have to try again, and sometimes be explicit that you are querying a transcript or a video.
When chatting with multiple documents, when you click a citation to one of the documents, it doesn't take you to the correct document page. It will take you to the page number of the document that is loaded.
So if I have document one loaded and it’s 10 pages long, and the citation points to document two, page 5, it will go to page 5 of document one. If you switch to document two, then of course it will work. However, Afforial, Socrates, and NotebookLM will do this automatically.
Also, when adding references from a literature review, while it works okay, there is no way to check from your chat that this has been done in the past. Once added, it gives a green tick, but when you go back to the chat, there is no indicator that the reference has been added.
On an iPad, the interface isn't well optimized; you have to rotate to see different parts of the screen.
I hope that some of these observations will be considered for review by the paperguide team and integrated into the product. I give it three stars (willing to updaste in the future) for now sincne I think its an improving producte but also has some rough edges.
Mallik_Paperguide
Dec 10, 2024Hi Richard,
Thanks for your detailed feedback. We really appreciate the time and effort you took to share these. As a product, we are evolving and improving every day and week, based on feedbacks and suggestions from users like you. I am sharing our plans and responses for the issues you mentioned.
1. Copying the Answer to the Writer Document: We will add an option to copy answers directly to the...
Share Paperguide