Q: How Much Can I Do With 8 or 24 Cloud Execution Hours?
I'm not really sure how much "Cloud execution hours" actually means. Can you give me an idea of what that looks like? I'm curious how much I could actually use if I had 8 or 24 Cloud execution hours.
"Cloud execution hours" refer to the total amount of time your robots are allowed to run in the cloud in a month.
How much you can accomplish within those hours depends on the nature of your automation. Some tasks are short and complete in 10–15 minutes, such as reading emails, classifying them, extracting data, and entering it into a CRM, or filling out and submitting a simple form.
Other tasks can take 1–2 hours or more, especially if you're processing hundreds or thousands of Excel files or generating complex reports. Some automations require gathering data from multiple systems, querying each one, waiting for responses, and collecting the results.
So this all depends on how long your automation process or processes takes to complete.
Thank you for your interest in Robomotion. Unfortunately, participation in the deal is managed by AppSumo, is available by invitation only and so it is not up to us. If you haven't already we would appreciate if you join our Discord at https://community.robomotion.io
I missed the deal but decided to ask so I can regret it :) I have TM Tier 5 and it works okay, but it looks cumbersome sometimes, so how does Robomotion compare?
These are different products. TM is a web automation tool designed to make automation as simple as clicking. Its main focus is the web. If it meets your needs, it’s a good choice. Its narrow focus allows it to improve steadily over time. If all you need is web automation and TM works for you, that’s great.
RM, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose tool. It lets you manage both web and desktop applications, access the operating system's file system, run robots locally, call APIs, create webhooks, design forms similar to Google Forms, build chatbots, and set up triggers. RPA tools are built as a collection of automation features. Covering more ground naturally takes more time, especially for a small team. Some areas improve faster based on usage, while others take longer. But overall, RM offers a broader toolkit and more possibilities. It’s meant to be a complete platform for all your automation needs.
RM is also a low-code tool. We firmly believe that no-code tools alone will eventually fall short when faced with complex automations. At some point, scripting becomes necessary. You might call it a blueprint or a magic script, but in the end, it’s still code. It’s not full-blown programming, which we avoid, but just a few lines of code can solve most issues. And now, with AI, writing 3 to 5 lines of code has become easier even if you have no programming experience.
No-code tools are great when they work for you, but they can be frustrating when they don't because they are too limited to handle complex problems. Coding tools are also difficult, as they require a lot of knowledge, and writing, deploying, and maintaining code can be cumbersome. Low-code sits between these two extremes. It’s easier than full coding and more capable than no-code when it comes to solving complex problems. No-code tools often have to make strong assumptions or decisions for you, while low-code tools aim to be as flexible as possible. No-code has a very small learning curve and is easy to start with, while low-code requires more time and effort to learn.
RM becomes a superpower once you spend time with it and turns into your go-to tool for any automation. RM is a long-term investment that grows more valuable the more you learn and use it.
We are currently renewing everything to become a much more AI-integrated tool, and making it easier to use. Our new Admin Console and new Desktop Launcher are coming soon. The final part of this update is a complete redesign of our 5-year-old Designer, now rebuilt with fully integrated generative AI capabilities.
Q: How robomotion is better than Chatgpt / Anthropic operators
I recently saw demos of the ChatGPT Operator and Anthropic's Claude Operator, both of which can automate tasks with simple text commands. I'm curious, what are the unique benefits that Robomotion offers that these operators can't match?
What you see with ChatGPT Operator and Anthropic Claude Computer Use are just happy-path demonstrations, technology demos and wishful thinking for future AGI capabilities. They are nowhere near being able to complete a reasonable long tasks deterministically. These systems are probabilistic by nature, not reliable, and can fail at any time you run them.
In contrast, programmed behaviors like RPA are deterministic, if a run works once, you can be confident it will work 100% the same way next time, assuming nothing changes (which is relatively rare but still more controllable).
Another very important point: when an RPA automation fails, you have full control to fix it. It’s usually due to a site change or an added element, you fix the issue, reset everything, and it’s ready to run again. With AI-based automations like Operator and Computer Use, you have no such control. You just write a prompt and hope it works.
Q: Please Advise
Will you be coming back?
Share Robomotion RPA - Plus Exclusive
Q: How Much Can I Do With 8 or 24 Cloud Execution Hours?
I'm not really sure how much "Cloud execution hours" actually means. Can you give me an idea of what that looks like? I'm curious how much I could actually use if I had 8 or 24 Cloud execution hours.
Faik_Robomotion
May 5, 2025A: Hello,
"Cloud execution hours" refer to the total amount of time your robots are allowed to run in the cloud in a month.
How much you can accomplish within those hours depends on the nature of your automation. Some tasks are short and complete in 10–15 minutes, such as reading emails, classifying them, extracting data, and entering it into a CRM, or filling out and submitting a simple form.
Other tasks can take 1–2 hours or more, especially if you're processing hundreds or thousands of Excel files or generating complex reports. Some automations require gathering data from multiple systems, querying each one, waiting for responses, and collecting the results.
So this all depends on how long your automation process or processes takes to complete.
Best,
Share Robomotion RPA - Plus Exclusive
Q: When will you be back?
I just realized tier 4 doesn't have any cloud hours
Faik_Robomotion
May 1, 2025A: Hello Bob,
Thank you for your interest in Robomotion. Unfortunately, participation in the deal is managed by AppSumo, is available by invitation only and so it is not up to us. If you haven't already we would appreciate if you join our Discord at https://community.robomotion.io
Best,
Share Robomotion RPA - Plus Exclusive
Q: Is this better than Task Magic?
I missed the deal but decided to ask so I can regret it :) I have TM Tier 5 and it works okay, but it looks cumbersome sometimes, so how does Robomotion compare?
Faik_Robomotion
May 1, 2025A: Hi,
These are different products. TM is a web automation tool designed to make automation as simple as clicking. Its main focus is the web. If it meets your needs, it’s a good choice. Its narrow focus allows it to improve steadily over time. If all you need is web automation and TM works for you, that’s great.
RM, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose tool. It lets you manage both web and desktop applications, access the operating system's file system, run robots locally, call APIs, create webhooks, design forms similar to Google Forms, build chatbots, and set up triggers. RPA tools are built as a collection of automation features. Covering more ground naturally takes more time, especially for a small team. Some areas improve faster based on usage, while others take longer. But overall, RM offers a broader toolkit and more possibilities. It’s meant to be a complete platform for all your automation needs.
RM is also a low-code tool. We firmly believe that no-code tools alone will eventually fall short when faced with complex automations. At some point, scripting becomes necessary. You might call it a blueprint or a magic script, but in the end, it’s still code. It’s not full-blown programming, which we avoid, but just a few lines of code can solve most issues. And now, with AI, writing 3 to 5 lines of code has become easier even if you have no programming experience.
No-code tools are great when they work for you, but they can be frustrating when they don't because they are too limited to handle complex problems. Coding tools are also difficult, as they require a lot of knowledge, and writing, deploying, and maintaining code can be cumbersome. Low-code sits between these two extremes. It’s easier than full coding and more capable than no-code when it comes to solving complex problems. No-code tools often have to make strong assumptions or decisions for you, while low-code tools aim to be as flexible as possible. No-code has a very small learning curve and is easy to start with, while low-code requires more time and effort to learn.
RM becomes a superpower once you spend time with it and turns into your go-to tool for any automation. RM is a long-term investment that grows more valuable the more you learn and use it.
We are currently renewing everything to become a much more AI-integrated tool, and making it easier to use. Our new Admin Console and new Desktop Launcher are coming soon. The final part of this update is a complete redesign of our 5-year-old Designer, now rebuilt with fully integrated generative AI capabilities.
Best,
Share Robomotion RPA - Plus Exclusive
Q: How robomotion is better than Chatgpt / Anthropic operators
I recently saw demos of the ChatGPT Operator and Anthropic's Claude Operator, both of which can automate tasks with simple text commands. I'm curious, what are the unique benefits that Robomotion offers that these operators can't match?
Faik_Robomotion
May 1, 2025A: Hi,
What you see with ChatGPT Operator and Anthropic Claude Computer Use are just happy-path demonstrations, technology demos and wishful thinking for future AGI capabilities. They are nowhere near being able to complete a reasonable long tasks deterministically. These systems are probabilistic by nature, not reliable, and can fail at any time you run them.
In contrast, programmed behaviors like RPA are deterministic, if a run works once, you can be confident it will work 100% the same way next time, assuming nothing changes (which is relatively rare but still more controllable).
Another very important point: when an RPA automation fails, you have full control to fix it. It’s usually due to a site change or an added element, you fix the issue, reset everything, and it’s ready to run again. With AI-based automations like Operator and Computer Use, you have no such control. You just write a prompt and hope it works.
Best,
Share Robomotion RPA - Plus Exclusive