Q: How robomotion is better than Chatgpt / Anthropic operators
I recently saw demos of the ChatGPT Operator and Anthropic's Claude Operator, both of which can automate tasks with simple text commands. I'm curious, what are the unique benefits that Robomotion offers that these operators can't match?
Faik_Robomotion
May 1, 2025A: Hi,
What you see with ChatGPT Operator and Anthropic Claude Computer Use are just happy-path demonstrations, technology demos and wishful thinking for future AGI capabilities. They are nowhere near being able to complete a reasonable long tasks deterministically. These systems are probabilistic by nature, not reliable, and can fail at any time you run them.
In contrast, programmed behaviors like RPA are deterministic, if a run works once, you can be confident it will work 100% the same way next time, assuming nothing changes (which is relatively rare but still more controllable).
Another very important point: when an RPA automation fails, you have full control to fix it. It’s usually due to a site change or an added element, you fix the issue, reset everything, and it’s ready to run again. With AI-based automations like Operator and Computer Use, you have no such control. You just write a prompt and hope it works.
Best,