Writingmate Reviews

I have been using WritingMate since Apr 17, 2026, and overall my experience is mixed.

The best thing about this tool is its simple and clean interface. It feels very similar to ChatGPT, so it is easy to use even for beginners. Another strong point is that it supports multiple AI models in one place, which is very convenient.

One feature I really like is the Projects option. You can set a master prompt in the project settings and keep similar tasks under one project. This helps maintain consistency and saves time. It feels similar to how projects work in Claude. Also, having chat, image, and video tools in one platform is a big time saver.

However, the tool is not very stable yet. Sometimes, during a chat, it suddenly shows a “something went wrong” error and stops working. When I refresh the page, the entire previous conversation is lost. This is the biggest drawback for me.

I also faced confusion with API usage. I had added my OpenRouter API, but there was no balance in that account. Even though I still had credits in WritingMate, I could not use the tool. After removing the API, it started working again. This is confusing. It would be better if the tool used its own credits first and only used the API as a backup.

Another issue is that some menu clicks redirect to the upgrade page, which feels unnecessary and should be improved.

The image generation tool also needs improvement. Even when selecting landscape mode, it sometimes creates square images. Also, there is no proper 16:9 option, and custom image size is not available. Adding custom size control would be very helpful.

In dark mode, the messages I send appear with a white background. This does not match the dark theme. It would be better to use a darker shade for user messages.

I have not used the agent and video features yet, but the agent feature looks promising and useful.

In my opinion, if this tool continues to improve and the team supports lifetime users properly, it can be a very good investment. I purchased Tier 2, and it is enough for entry-level needs.

However, the daily limits should be increased. The Ultimate messages are only 5, which is the same as Tier 1. It should be at least 10, because 5 messages are not enough to solve a problem in one session. The Pro messages should also be increased to around 50. Currently, the limit is 34, which feels low. Many users do not work daily. Instead, they complete most of their writing in one or two days per week. With the current limits, it is hard to finish longer conversations.

Overall, the tool has good potential, but it still needs improvements in stability, usability, and limits.

Best wishes to the team.

I mainly use Writingmate for content creation. I’m very satisfied with my experience so far. I also work with Abacus, and WM is just as good an aggregator as Abacus—at a price that’s unbeatable. Thank you so much for offering this indispensable tool for internet marketing.

This is my 3rd day using Writingmate. This tool has great potential. Yesterday, I had the first problem when the chat said, "Something went wrong - An error occurred." The problem was fixed in 1-2 hours, but I lost all my work from 4-5 prompts. The chat responses disappeared, and I can't get them back, so I have to do them again.

Tested the open code configuration; the responses were delayed as I waited a few minutes for a complete output. After only two prompts, I used up my daily limit of 34 messages (with Tier 2), so the open code option wasn't a good choice. I plan to use the chat mode in the future and hope to have a stable experience. If this tool remains functional for 2-3 years, that will be a win for me.

It's a useful tool that is working for me. I just hope I don't have to deal with disappearing output after a chat error. I looked at Claude's status yesterday, and everything was running smoothly.

开发者你好，我购买的是最高等级终身方案，作为对该产品的诚恳支持，并衷心希望你们可以越做越好。
产品在额度和模型丰富度上无疑是非常令人满意的，调用模型的响应速度也很快，文本方面的内容我很满意。总之，大部分都是优点，所以我很喜欢你们的产品。
不过在经过短暂使用后，有一个比较在意的问题：
当我调用gemini的生图模型后，生成的图片总是只有1k左右的分辨率，并且没有看到能调整清晰度的选项。
而根据我在gemini官网使用的情况来看，官网的图片无疑会清晰至少四倍以上。
我可以理解这里有成本方面的考量，但目前这样的清晰度会导致图片功能处于难以正常使用的状态。
不知道关于这个问题，后续准备如何解决，又或者是我还没有掌握正确的使用方式？
希望能得到您的回复。

You get access to many of the best AI models in one place and can even compare them side by side, which is incredibly useful. Features like agents, projects, MCP integrations, API, chat with files, and web search make it a serious all-in-one AI workspace and a real competitor to ChatGPT, Gemini, and others. I also like how quickly new models get added - Opus 4.7, for example, was integrated right away. The platform feels modern and constantly improving.

My main criticism is the image and video generation. There are many models available, but I have run into bugs, and some important features are still missing. What bothers me most is that image generation with models like Nano Banana 2 is limited to 1K resolution. It also lacks more advanced creative options, like uploading more reference images or using end frames for videos.

So no, Writingmate is not a true replacement for a dedicated multi-AI tool for images and videos. But as a multi-LLM platform for text, research, and productivity, it is excellent.

Despite that criticism, this is still a clear 5 Tacos for me. Writingmate is one of the best multi-LLM deals I have seen in a long time, and as a lifetime deal, it is hard to beat.