Phygital+ Reviews

Booked a meeting to solve a simple login issue, currently waiting on the zoom line with my content lead. We are 10 min into the scheduled meeting time (which is 6:30 AM) time zones mae this the only reasonable option...

I have been using the tool, it works well and puts out decent images for social without much effort, as a small show we don't have a lot of high end needs so the limitations are fine. (our clients don't seem to mind)

The platform could be great if the customer service was even good vs non existent.

UPDATE 11/23/2025
I decided to completely refund because platforms like yapper are getting things i asked for and phygital's team has been unresponsive to some questions on appsumo. I literally see some questions haven't been responded to in two weeks. Seeing how long support takes, makes me question the future.

UPDATE 11/6/2025

Raised from 1 star to 2 stars because they did add ideogram recently. I want to like phygital but the costs is so expensive but the worse issue of all is they offer the lower resolution versions where as other platforms have higher resolutions of many of their models and are cheaper. It is cool they added krea, ideogram, and magnific, but i don't know if that is enough for me stay because the costs are not practical and they also don't have models i actually need to solve real production issues and then there is the overpriced issue.

I refunded two of my four Tier 3 Phygital accounts. Many prompts fail due to excessive censorship. Runway Aleph is disappointing — limited to five-second clips, poor prompt adherence, and a downgrade from 1080p to 720p.

Their Krea is only the 720p version. Other platforms offer krea at 4k resolution and are cheaper.

A newer model, Ditto, performs better than Aleph but isn’t available on Phygital. I requested WAN 2.2 Replicate and WAN 2.2 Animate over a month ago, but if these aren’t confirmed soon, I’ll refund all.

Since that request, a new model called Mocha has emerged, offering higher resolution and stronger prompt accuracy than even WAN 2.2 Replicate and WAN 2.2 Animate. Ideally, Phygital should add Mocha, WAN 2.2 Replicate, and WAN 2.2 Animate.

Dream Omni 2 is a new model that is not on phygital and it surpasses Qwen, Seedream, Nanobanana, and Flux.

The credit pricing is no longer competitive — similar or superior models are cheaper elsewhere. AppSumo even offers a platform with Sora access at one-eighth the Phygital cost.

UPDATE 10/29/2025

The platform is unusable for horror clips due to over-moderation that blocks prompts which work fine elsewhere. I reduced my rating to one star. I’m 43 — I don’t need to be moderated like a child.

Original Review

Phygital refuses to lower credit prices, so it must stand out with exclusive, high-value models. Many of its current tools are cheaper on competing platforms, and several remain capped at 720p while others now offer 1080p or 4K.

To stay competitive, Phygital needs higher resolutions, advanced performance capture, and professional-grade lipsync tools.

Recommended Additions

Ditto – Superior to Runway Aleph; performs prompt-based video editing.

MiniMax 2.3 – High-fidelity facial motion and product animation up to 1080p.

LTX 2 – Next-gen text- and image-to-video model with 4K output and audio sync.

Dzine – Precision face tracking and manual lipsync control.

OmniHuman – Converts full-body performances into animation with synced audio.

Lipdub AI – Studio-grade lipsync for dialogue and film scenes.

WAN 2.2 Replace / Animate / 2.5 – Realistic subject swaps, motion mapping, and high-detail animation.

Qwen Image Edit – Fixes compositional errors.

Excel to Video / Image – Automates campaign visuals and product content.

Higgsfield VFX – Adds motion-tracked cinematic effects like fire, smoke, or lightning.

Grok Imagine – xAI text-to-video model with sound and creative flexibility.

HiDream I1 – Large text-to-image model for photorealistic and stylized results.

Recraft V3 – Produces clean vector and raster graphics with accurate text.

Technical Summary

Mocha – Delivers best-in-class prompt adherence and high-resolution video generation, outperforming Runway Aleph and WAN 2.2 Animate in consistency and realism.

WAN 2.2 Replicate & Animate – Professional-grade motion mapping, subject replacement, and lipsync precision.

WAN 2.5 – Enhanced texture, lighting, and motion quality for lifelike animation.

Dream Omni 2 – Superior character editing and continuity across frames.

Dzine, OmniHuman, and Lipdub AI – Together, provide advanced face, body, and lipsync animation.

Higgsfield VFX – Adds dynamic, depth-based visual effects.

Grok Imagine – Rapid text-to-video generation with integrated audio.

Excel to Video / Image – Enables automated visual content creation for campaigns.

Ditto – High-fidelity, prompt-driven video editor with stronger results than Runway Aleph.

Final Thoughts

Phygital still has potential, but without Mocha, WAN 2.2, or Ditto, it’s overpriced compared to competitors offering better tools and lifetime access.

To truly stand out, Phygital should focus on realistic animation, precision lipsync, and advanced automation — emphasizing models like Mocha, WAN 2.2 Replicate, WAN 2.2 Animate, WAN 2.5, Dzine, OmniHuman, Lipdub AI, Higgsfield VFX, and Grok Imagine.

Adding Dream Omni 2 and Ditto would complete a balanced toolkit for creators seeking consistent, high-quality output.

If these key models or updates aren’t implemented soon, I’ll refund my remaining Tier 3 accounts.

i like this because this provide bunch of tool in one spot.

This is a powerful tool for image and video generation/editing (with some prompt development features too). It has huge potential. The templates are brilliant—they give you practical ideas and save you so much time. I love it!

Phygital+ delivers a well-built UX and UI experience that feels modern and efficient. The modular flow builder and ready made templates is a clever move, being able to connect steps and experiment with different AI models makes the whole creative process faster and more flexible. As someone running an agency, I can see how this setup can cut production time across multiple content formats. Some models still needs som tweaks, for better quality and better resolution on both image and video.

The only real drawback is the credit system. Pricing feels to steep, but even worse after I bought extra credits, my existing ones disappeared. Support said they are looking into it, but it’s something they should tighten up. Beyond that, it’s a solid, tech-forward tool that deserves attention from serious creators.

I'm looking forward for this Startup to improve their applications and launching new features.